Originally Posted by
sXeRyan
I completely disagree - I think that on the woman's side, by consenting to engage in sex with him, knowing the possible risks involved (pregnancy etc) that she enters into some sort of social contract that makes them equally responsible for what comes out of it. (both for decision making and financially)
Think about it this way, if she chose to keep it - she can hold him responsible to pay for it. So why can't he hold her into keeping it on the same grounds? They both new the possibilities and they still "entered into the contract" all the same.