FBI does 2257 check

[BradleyFL]

Anyone read the top story on AVNOnline?

http://avnonline.com/index.php?Prima...tent_ID=272407

[Lee]

Cool stuff, cant wait to see who gets shut down first now

I must imagine being confronted by the Feds at your door must be a really scary thing initially.

Regards,

Lee

[basschick]

"initially"?

Cool stuff, cant wait to see who gets shut down first now

I must imagine being confronted by the Feds at your door must be a really scary thing initially.

Regards,

Lee

[marcjacob]

Does any of this 2257 crap apply to me as im outside the usa? i do try to obey all usa laws that apply to the biz but im wondering if some legal advise is due.

[chadknowslaw]

Does any of this 2257 crap apply to me as im outside the usa? i do try to obey all usa laws that apply to the biz but im wondering if some legal advise is due.

The position of the DOJ is that 2257 applies to you if you do business in the United States. However, the DOJ does not have authority to go into your place of business outside the United States to inspect your records. If you are accused of a crime, such as distributing child pornography, then using proper channels and the authority of treaties the local authorities could go to your place of business and search. This does first require some articulable suspicion and evidence of a crime -- just wanting to check your records for compliance is not significant enough for you to be subject to a search. So, yes, in my opinion 2257 does apply to you but without some evidence of a crime being committed US authorities cannot come to your business outside the US or its territories just to inspect your records.

If you recall one of the executives of an online sports betting company [a company big enough that its shares are publicly traded in London] was just arrested in the United States, even though the company's only real connection to the US was accepting bets from US citizens. Being offshore does not completely insulate anyone from the reach of US law.

[marcjacob]

that clears things up, thanks. i think legal advice might be a good idea anyway. just to make sure everything i do is legal in the uk.

i still think all this 2257 stuff is a waste of time. ive allways argued that legit companies will follow it and cp producers will remain covert. i dont think this stops a single act of abuse, its just more red tape for legit producers


:3ymca: <-- president bush the wolly