I think it's also worth noting a couple of things here:
1. a number of people on the gay side of the industry had been wanting to do a gay-themed networking event for several years. AVN had shown no interest. Only after Ron Cadwell personally got behind the idea of GPF and put on a successful event did AVN magically decide to do TWO events, one of which is clearly a "fuck you" to GPF because it was, I don't care what anyone says, intentionally scheduled directly opposite the GPF timeframe. And let's not forget that AVN also tried, before they were immediately rebuked, to schedule Internext against Phoenix Forum in 2007.
2. CCBill has been promoting these events for years. They have always welcomed alternate billers; Epoch was a major sponsor for GPF, a sponsor for Phoenix Forum, and I'm pretty certain I remember Netbilling and/or some of the alternative billers as previous sponsors of the Phoenix Forum as well. For AVN/Epoch to take a stand that limits consumer access and choice has the effect of segmenting the industry, which is the absolute LAST thing the industry needs.
3. Honest competition makes things better for consumers. If AVN can run a better event than CCBill, people will choose to go to that event. IF CCBill runs the better event, people will go there. If both events are excellent, people will probably go to both. A wise approach in a free market economy is to compete by providing a better product, not by limiting competition or forcing people to make choices that don't need to be made.
I am not happy with Epoch or with AVN at this moment.
Bookmarks