Gay marriage is risky, but banning it is riskier

[jIgG]

Banning gay marriage guarantees that the country will busy itself creating gay-inclusive alternatives to marriage (which will be tempting to heterosexuals) and bestowing legal rights and social recognition on cohabitation (which is open to heterosexuals by definition). The result will be to diminish marriage's special status among a plethora of "lifestyle alternatives"—the last thing marriage needs.

http://www.reason.com/rauch/051804.shtml

[Lee]

You see to me at least, i see no risk either way

If they legalize gay marriage the government gets more tax dollars to spend.

If the dont legalize gay marriage whats going to happen? Bush stands a chance of being kicked out of office.

Wheres the risk? LOL

Regards,

Lee