NATS vs MPA3

[asiaboy]

I've been running our affiliate tracking on Epoch so far, and now think of moving on, either to NATS or MPA3.

I've asked NATS for more info, but did not get a reply. I guess they're not interested in doing business. So might MPA3 be a better choice? Their website does not inspire me much either..right in the first sentence of their index page there is a grammar error. If they're that careless I wonder how good their software can be.

[BBweb]

nats :brit:

[Jay_StandAhead]

Definitely, absolutely NATS!

How did you contact TMM? They usually reply pretty fast, I wouldn't dismiss them based on a missed email or anything like that. Their client support is fast and good.

[asiaboy]

Sure enough...I got a reply from them about 10 minutes after I posted the initial message.

[HunkyLuke]

I like NATS better too, I looked at MPA when they came out with their budget version (99/mo) but it was very limited in which billers it allowed, so it was all but useless given that you can get the same cascading done in either ccbill or epoch now.

We just upgraded EmoProfits to NATS 4.1, I think they **finally** got NATS4 right with this upgrade. It combines a user-friendly interface (like nats 3 was) with extremely detailed stats, and from the backend it all flows nicely now.

[SPACE GLIDER]

go with NATS

[steven619]

Most of our clients use NATS too.