I need your guys help.

[Chadster]

I definitely like the colors and the graphics. I agree about the guys being tan.

One thing that really annoyed me was the constant blinking, I found it very distracting -- other than that nice job :donmike:

[marcjacob]

Could you not have a tour for 800x600 aswell? You can detect the users browser size. It would be a shame to loose the big page as i like that alot and there arnt too many sites catering for the majority screen size.

[WegCash Robert]

Could you not have a tour for 800x600 aswell? You can detect the users browser size. It would be a shame to loose the big page as i like that alot and there arnt too many sites catering for the majority screen size.

Hey good idea! I will put that in my notes.

Thanks!!

[maxpower]

Well being a Str8 Company not sure I can help you too much, but I do agree with what Bass said. I will also add that I think your lawyer did a really good job on creating the tour for this site :thumbsup:

[Dzinerbear]

I don't know that I would bother with smaller resolution designs. This is a high-def site. Anyone who has the internet connection to deal with high-def, probably also has their screen resolution set to 1024 or higher. So many people have larger monitors now, I wouldn't baby the people who don't. The wider design, the high-def movies, the original content ... they're all good selling features. I love the wide design, it really fills up my screen.

Michael

[Xstr8guy]

I don't know that I would bother with smaller resolution designs. This is a high-def site. Anyone who has the internet connection to deal with high-def, probably also has their screen resolution set to 1024 or higher. So many people have larger monitors now, I wouldn't baby the people who don't. The wider design, the high-def movies, the original content ... they're all good selling features. I love the wide design, it really fills up my screen.

Michael

Ditto! Who views at 800x600 these days? Some guy with a Packard Bell 13" monitor? Don't bother.

[basschick]

well, over 15% of my users. and considering they have a 512k quicktime vid for each video as well as an HD vid, seems like they're trying to straddle the line a little.

also 20 to 25% of the people who join our site use our dialup clips, which are admittedly better than many sites' dialup clips but are still only 120k.

Ditto! Who views at 800x600 these days? Some guy with a Packard Bell 13" monitor? Don't bother.

[WegCash Robert]

This is all good information. I appreciate it all.

Thanks you guys!!

[Xstr8guy]

well, over 15% of my users. and considering they have a 512k quicktime vid for each video as well as an HD vid, seems like they're trying to straddle the line a little.

also 20 to 25% of the people who join our site use our dialup clips, which are admittedly better than many sites' dialup clips but are still only 120k.

Lol. Somehow I knew you'd disagree with me.
I just don't see a lot of value in trying to cater to every single surfer in the world.

Oh but you'll lose those .00002% of surfers using Navigator 1.0 on their Linux machine with an Intel 486 33MHz processor, 9600bps modem and 9" monochrome monitor.

Good! They are too much trouble anyways. I'll try to cater to the surfers that have a little more expendable income.