Printable View
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/1...n_2288799.html
When I first saw this post last night, I went to Google > Images, and searched on a couple of my brands, and sure enough!
it used to be that images of my uncensored box covers, and full frontal promo pics of my models came up pretty regularly in Google Image searches.
Not today!
But the censored box covers are showing, and non-nude pics of my models.
I also searched on a couple of other models/actors in porn, and they too were non-nude.
So if in Google > Images I type in "dudelodge.com" , I get non-nude images.
If I type in "dudelodge.com porn" , I get nude images.
Tricks of the trade.
I would joke that they must have dick recognition software, but they very well may.Quote:
Originally Posted by nickbaer
I cram to understand why google hates our industry so much...
I think people who know what they want, most likely know where and how to look for porn. I don't think that people stumbling upon porn accidentally are such a big source of income. The world has changed a lot in the past twenty years and porn isn't so much a mystery and hidden treasure anymore. And I don't want little Billy, who's looking for some info about his new buddy Dick find out the other meaning of the word by discovering descriptive pictures on a search engine, let alone all the things you can do with it beside of peeing.
And actually I've pretty much given up caring about what Google does or not. It just eats too much time jumping through their burning hoops. Time I better spend with developing different, more reliable ways to generate traffic for my sites.
Luckily this is only for the image search though
These new filters on Image Search add to the Panda restrictions, which penalize all sorts of sites for all sorts of reasons that only benefits Google's Adwords paid advertising for search results and page ranking dominance.
It was kind of creepy to search on a person's name, and have dozens of nude and sexually explicit images appear of porn models with names remotely similar to the searched on name.
In typical Google fuzzy matching, often the porn model's name had little to do with the searched on name.
But then, searching on a specific porn model name and only being served non-nude and edited images, unless one adds "porn" etc. to the search keywords, begs the question of manipulation.
It's not a question, it's a fact that G manipulates and censors searches.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Censors...gle#Censorship
Google has people working on filtering the search results and assigns ratings to domains and pages
Tho merely adding porn to my query hasn't given me porn results many times
yes i am agree
the 1st and 2nd Pages of Search Engines are now the "Validated Parking" ( Paid Advertisers ) everything else falls into line accordingly ( interpreted: you'll find your Site "Parked" on the 11th Floor nowhere near the Elevator! - LOL )
the word "GAY" still has some influence regardless of Advertisers ( exp. gayicon ) , I guess the Internet can't be "prejudiced either!" ... or maybe it's because the only naked Images I found were those of "Straight Men" - LOL
- jim
Attachment 4283