when i was testing a content management script i wrote for my new straight paysite, i uploaded some group sex gay images. must have forgot to delete them as just had an email from a member asking if im "taking the piss".
oops lol
when i was testing a content management script i wrote for my new straight paysite, i uploaded some group sex gay images. must have forgot to delete them as just had an email from a member asking if im "taking the piss".
oops lol
After many years of me BEATING it in to the others here, they finally caved - I was finally able to get them to add links, to the members areas of our gay sites, to our straight big dick sites.
We also offer an exclusive models section of solo guys posing & masturbating, as well hardcore content.
It's been sometime but we have yet to receive a complaint, as well retention went up, as did the use of the links. We kept an eye on the clicks or usage and found it to be enough to leave them exactly where they are!
I can understand the exclusion from a mainstream or teen site.
I always put links to gay content on my str8 sites, never know who's curious.
the member cancelled anyhow. how do you guys do it? pehaps he was abit homophobic but he clearly wasnt happy about it. maybe if i say "male images" it would go down better as people dont have to click.
this set was grouped in with girly porn pics.
In all honesty, I do not concern myself with what one subscriber thinks. I start to get concerned when there is a tendency (more people with the same issues).Quote:
Originally Posted by marcjacob
Our site is big dick specific, so I like to think our subscribers are not as phobic as those that say belong to extremely straight site (solo teen females, ghetto bunnies etc).
The text we use is Monster Gay Cocks (the site name), as well Looking for gay content. I was thinking of changing the second, but both get click, quite often, so it was left alone.