So im working on re-categorizing some of the content i have in my CMS right now and was wondering, what would you say the 'largest' size a 'small cock' should be?
6 Inches and smaller, 5 inches and smaller?
Any thoughts on this?
Regards,
Lee
Printable View
So im working on re-categorizing some of the content i have in my CMS right now and was wondering, what would you say the 'largest' size a 'small cock' should be?
6 Inches and smaller, 5 inches and smaller?
Any thoughts on this?
Regards,
Lee
If you are talking about small cocks, I consider 5 inches and below small.
If I am correct that's the same as 15cm and below... which I think would fit into that category.
I say when the model holds his cock in his hand to jack off, and you don't see a shaft... just the head on top and balls on the bottom.
Kinda like mine.
five inches and below is small. I had a ruler and was overjoyed when I passed that test years ago
5 and below for a small cock site
Aren't those models called bottoms? :shades:Quote:
Originally Posted by Rimmates.com
cheers,
Luke
[off topic]Quote:
Originally Posted by Bec
Bec, i love your new avatar, just wanted to say :D
[back on topic]
I just checked, yay i passed the test!
i think a small cock is about looks in porn. sure, a guy who's 6'6" with 7 inches may be fairly big in person, but on a website a guy that tall with a 7 incher still is going to LOOK small.
Thank GOD I'm only 5'8". lol.Quote:
Originally Posted by basschick
And... why on earth would someone be turned on by a small cock site? That's one niche I will never understand. :D
Yes, or big-handed guys :)Quote:
Originally Posted by Chilihost
What a hard topic this is - difficult to grasp :innocent:
Sure, one can apply the simple 5" rule, however there are always exceptions.
Our members submit their pictures to us, daily. I've seen SO many different dick shapes and sizes (erect and flacid) it's somewhat disturbing!
To me, a 7" dick is not always big (especially when the head is just as thin as the shaft - 2" girth), and a 5" dick is not always small (especially when the thing is as thick as a soup can).
I agree with The Chick: it all depends on what it's attached to. If a 5" dick is endowed with a 130lbs 5'6" man it will look big, but if it is attached to a 300lbs 6'6" man it will :vanish:
Another category that does well is 'perfect' (the perfect cock), because it is not always about size.
Members love drooling over (section receives a lot of clicks) averaged size cocks that have it all going for them (not too small, not too thin, not multi or discoloured, a bulbous or mushroomed head - bigger than shaft - veiny, :scissors: etc).
That is so simple: some people lead a conservative & cautious life and like things that cause no pain. People such as those that feel sex is a waste of time (it is not for fun; copulation is only for making babies).Quote:
Originally Posted by Xstr8guy
I rarely receive mail from members stating things such as "that cock is simply too big", however, I always get mail looking for more (thicker, longer & mean looking).
I'm actually one of those guys who has a very fond appreciation for small cocks. I'm not talking 4 inches or anything, but 4.5, 5, 6-inch cocks are VERY hot to me. A lot of guys are really insecure about that stuff, and I love to make a guy feel good about his dick by telling him how hot it is.Quote:
Originally Posted by Xstr8guy
I used to "date" (OK, I had an affair with) a major porn star who had a rather small cock, and man, it was such a turnon to see him go from total bottom to hot top because I encouraged him to get in touch with his "inner top" and accept his dick as being a beautiful part of him.
I don't know... I know I'm weird. I just don't think the way that other gay men do. It's all about size-size-size for most gay men. And I just think that's stupid. Big muscles, big chests, big cocks, big guys... who cares? A man is not defined by his body parts; he is defined by how he uses them. :)
IMHO
Anything over 7" is porn.
I thinks 5inches below is a small cock..