Free sites..yet another question!

Should free sites be showing any hardcore sex? or should it just be a teaser and have the guy just strip down to nothing? is it better to show some action or is that just help them get off and not buy?


:maxpower:

It depends on the niche.

Some niches you really cant sell without showing hardcore.

That being said, for the most part i prefer to keep all our hardcore stuff behind a members area, whether that be on a paysite or an AEN site, we need to be re-educating surfers that they need to pay for pink.

We've been giving the cart (and the horse) away for to long.

Regards,

Lee

People have been debating that for years.

I'm in the hardcore camp - maybe because softcore doesn't really appeal to me in the first place.

And of course it depends on your niche.

And your content supply.

With hardcore, a judicious choosing of content to tease and lure the surfer definitely helps - and it conserves purchased content. You "water down" the best hardcore scenes with a mixing in of less hardcore (or just generally more boring) pics.

There are a number of linklists that may decline your freesite if you don't show a cock in the first gallery - that's something to keep in mind.

There are also places that will decline you if your pics are all too similar.

However, these types of declines are less common nowadays - there seem to be fewer submitters than there used to be, and with TGPS everything is mostly paid accounts, so the listers are a bit less picky.

It's been said before but may be worth repeating: 2257, in spite of its many evils, may be a silver lining to the cloud of internet porn. If secondary producers (affiliates, bloggers, tubes, etc.) can't maintain model documents which they don't possess, the font of free hardcore porn may dry up, and surfers will only get the tease, not the entire video/photoshoot including the cum shots.

However, non-US will secondary producers will still be able to flood the market with explicit offerings.

Kevin