Printable View
Without getting in to the whole 'right or wrong' debate that these types of thread have done every time they started, those of you that do own or promote bareback websites, do you have any type of PSA advice or information up on your site about the risks involved with unprotected sex that your surfers can see?
Regards,
Lee
I dont on my site, although the sites i promote do. I tend to hope my users are inteligent enough to make their own choices. I dont believe its my place to either preech or offer health advice.
Whilst its true we do not have any obligation to preach to our surfer about the rights and wrongs of unprotected sex, do you not feel that we have a social obligation to show that we are doing what we can, even if it is simply linking to sites that do preach to the surfer?
There are laws on the books presently that are trying to attempt to mandate the use of condom in ALL porn production, surely if we take the stance that we're at least attempting to be socially responsible, even if in reality the vast majority of adult webmasters dont care, its going to benefit the industry as a whole?
Regards,
Lee
We do.
And we put a brief statement in our DVDs stating we test, we do not produce bareback films without a thorough test (which we do), and we state even with testing the models are not 100% safe. It's also stated the models make their own decisions. We pay the models the same amount for condom or bareback. We never suggest bareback to the models. They ask what we want to film, and we tell them. In the model applications we receive it's stated what they want and are looking for in working with us.
So yes, we do give statements and webpages.
Absolutely. We spell out our AIM testing policy, we give a bit of a PSA and Jake himself reveals that he's HIV- and plans to stay that way. We explain the difference between a standard STD test you get down at the doctor or the Gay and Lesbian center and the high-end and much more expensive AIM tests.
This is available on all three of our sites.
On a good day, HIV tests will reveal the presence of antibodies to the HIV virus developed over the previous 6 months.
The HIV test does nothing more than sort the positive guys (6 months after infection) from the negative guys.
It does nothing to prevent or protect - only to separate after the damage has been done.
Huh? what does that have to do with this thread?Quote:
Originally Posted by nickbaer