Ok, dumb question about "Twincest"

Ok so there are twins out there that actually get it on with each other on film, although this material is filmed in another country, is it actually legal to sell this in the USA? (Mainly the Peters Twins). And if it is legal to sell in the USA, how come it is illegal to film in the USA (Talking between two brothers). The reason for asking, I have a identical twins that want to film with us, one is gay, the other is bi - and it has been discussed of them filming together, if there is anyway around it (possibly filming in another country?). I don't want to totally break any major laws, just trying to see if there are any loop holes around it.

nevermind...answered my own question by scouring the net! In short, no we cant film it. Period.

but you could film them together fucking a guy? what if the extra guy blows them both with their cocks touching each other in his mouth? is that illegal? what if one twin is blowing the extra while the other drills him and he falls out and his bro slips him back in, is that illegal? lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StunnerDade

but you could film them together fucking a guy? what if the extra guy blows them both with their cocks touching each other in his mouth? is that illegal? what if one twin is blowing the extra while the other drills him and he falls out and his bro slips him back in, is that illegal? lol

---

Yeah, that's my question and suggestion ... don't have the twins having sex with each other, but in the same film doing another dude.

agreed with "passing" a 3rd between the twins , I could probably better answer this question if I had a picture of the twins! - LOL

- jim

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by longboardjim

agreed with "passing" a 3rd between the twins , I could probably better answer this question if I had a picture of the twins! - LOL

- jim

---

Correct, we need photos to assess the risk. :good:

hopefully their more "animate" than the "resnick twins" which is why I would test them with a 3rd. ( interpreted: I would be interested in the "signature edition" BLURAY with behind the scenes and mutual "fluffing" , please send me a PAYPAL account to transfer funds. - LOL )

- jim "collecting twins from BIJOU to LUKAS RIDGESTON" :toff:

Damn, what a shame the Peter's twins are so hot. Hope you find a way around it

Thing is they admitted to boning each other, but there are no loop holes in the law to allow for me to film it! Oh well...no big deal, I will just go and film them like another studio did with another set of twins here in the USA, just add a third to the party!

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by erosproductions

Thing is they admitted to boning each other

---

Isn't that terrific... *shakes head*

Odd question, but are they in Fort Lauderdale?

Tonight my neighbor stopped me to ask how The Phoenix Forum went and randomly asked me if I heard that there are two twins in town that do gay porn together.

I can't imagine there are that many in the US.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by StunnerJesse

Odd question, but are they in Fort Lauderdale?

Tonight my neighbor stopped me to ask how The Phoenix Forum went and randomly asked me if I heard that there are two twins in town that do gay porn together.

I can't imagine there are that many in the US.

---

Actually, if I'm correct, I read somewhere that the Peters twins were here in the States visiting. From what I have heard, they are actually thinking of moving to the USA - not sure how factual that info is, but we will probably find out more soon enough!

There are no laws or regulations filming twins of the same sex. Good luck finding that though.

The initial Western prohibition of incest was to prevent children being born of an incestuous relationship (beneficial to society to prevent retardation and genetic defects)

In the case of adult gay twins (or same sex) any prohibition would be as legally questionable applying the US Supreme courts ruling about the Privacy of the Bedroom and the sexual behavior of consenting adults.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lawrence_v._Texas

The majority held that intimate consensual sexual conduct was part of the liberty protected by substantive due process under the Fourteenth Amendment. Lawrence invalidated similar laws throughout the United States that criminalized sodomy between consenting adults acting in private, whatever the sex of the participants.[2]

as a layman I think Lawrence v Texas put any prohibitions on incest among adults on shaky constitutional grounds.