http://www.xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=7494
so many people i know were SO sure he'd be a more reasonable guy. doesn't look like it so far :(
Printable View
http://www.xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=7494
so many people i know were SO sure he'd be a more reasonable guy. doesn't look like it so far :(
I have to say in this instance, i dont think it would matter who the attorny general would have been, this is potentially a HUGE case for the government to lose and one way or another they will try their damndest to get a conviction.
On the other hand, if EA had been ruled against, they would have been able to appeal the decision so why not the other way around? Im sure one way or the other justice will prevail :)
Regards,
Lee
Great post Basschick :high:
In my personal experience with this kind of thing... they are very aggressive in trying to push their moral views on the court and will do whatever it takes... delays in proceedings/underhanded lawyering/appeals etc. In EA's case the DOJ themselves made the complaint of community standards so a lawsuit could be created!
Nobody can say what the end result will be in this case, with the current sociopolitical climate we're in ( yes judges do sometimes rule for sociopolitical reasons ). Maybe our government is like GWW.. free speech without censorship is ok as long as we're saying what they want us to say? :kiss:
I hope that freedom of speech is secure in today’s society... even when it's being attacked by the United States Department of Justice.