So What Are Your Thoughts On The Iran Situation?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CorbinFisher_BD

Or someone that writes about porn fancying themselves a journalist? :develish:

I don't think there's anything wrong with discussing things other than porn here. Threads like these make it apparent so many people here have a wealth of knowledge in areas far beyond just porn.

There's a difference between people simply sharing their opinions with one another and people assuming that just because someone's a celebrity, they're inherently able to offer an expert opinion on any and everything given more weight on account of the celebrity alone.

---

I was actually being facetious in my other opinion. I remember a while back some people were saying how ridiculous it was for celebrities to share their thoughts on political matters. That's all.

I'll assume your opening statement was merely a joke--albeit a bad one. Otherwise, we'd have problems. ;)

No country should have nuclear weapons but who are we to say they can't. I mean the USA is the only county to have ever used a nuclear weapon. Now we are the ones telling other countries they are not responsible enough to have them? It seems like the ultimate hypocrisy.

Well ok.... by that logic, Stalin's Soviet Russia mercilessly razed Germany as their army reoccupied it in 1945, and then made it a prison for fifty years. (and when I say razed they burned up everything in their path - grass, land that produced food, buildings, humans.. because they did not want a German people ever able to invade them again)

Do you know what Stalin proposed doing to Germany for war reparations... if Churchill and Roosevelt hadn't been there to stop him in Yalta?

As not to mention took over Latvia, Lithuania and Estonia. So let's say that the US's use of dropping two bombs in 1945 Japan destroys our ability to say how nuclear technology is used around the world.

So, why should Russia have moral license to sell nuclear technology to Iran? Why should their opinions on the UN Security Council therefore have moral weight?

Steve

:sun: The US government I think is pushing itself to rule the world rather than diplomacy. We are all afraid of other countries like Iran, Iraq, North Korea, Cuba,etc. on developing this nuclear weapons but we have forgot that US gov itself is engaging on this things. In fact, US secret military camps has been developing this nuclear against its enemies. Does this means that if you are an Islamic country or not on the side of US gov you are convicted as threatening entity to them and you dont have the right to build this nuclear weapons while US gov is doing it. History speaks louder on how US has been pushing off on war and millions of innocent people had died. Vietnam, Iraq, Korea, Cuba, Pakistan...name it there are a lot of countries that US had exploited in terms of human rights, territorial rights, international policy, religious practice,etc. The bottom line here is how serious and dedicated the US gov is in promoting peace and unity to the world. Before doing this they should stop first their secret nuclear military camps, pull off all JOEs in all countries, stop dictating the United Nations on what to do, stop controlling the world bank. I wonder why US gov keep on attacking middle east countries in asia... is it because of the reserve fuel? Also why there is continues war... I mean where these people gets their arms and equipment. Who's behind it? That sounds business for me. God bless America! :sun: