LMAO ... I've been bugging Don on that very thing for months and months!!Quote:
1) Having to log in every time (how about a cookie ounique)
Printable View
LMAO ... I've been bugging Don on that very thing for months and months!!Quote:
1) Having to log in every time (how about a cookie ounique)
I have to add
I was looking for some really old content I bought a very long time ago and couldn't find it.
So, I went to Ounique and looked at my history....and there it was!
I was able to download it again even though it was over 2 years ago that I bought it!
Now, that's service!!!
I had to come here and say this...
It's funny how this thread was here during the time that I was having content issues (not being able to find some of my old stuf)
Wow some great information shared int his thread and it even has stuff i would never ave thought would be an issue for people lol
So with all of the above said, what about pricing?
In your opinion, whats a 'reasonable' price for content sets?
I know some providers who charge upwards of $50 for a set of 50 pics, imho thats not a good deal, your thoughts on this?
Regards,
Lee
Greetings
Ok, I'm probably going to be the odd man out on this one, but:Quote:
Originally posted by Lee
In your opinion, whats a 'reasonable' price for content sets?
I know some providers who charge upwards of $50 for a set of 50 pics, imho thats not a good deal, your thoughts on this?
If it's good quality stuff, I WANT it to be expensive!!!!!
Do I mind paying $100 for a solo photoset that's high quality of a good looking model? HELL NO I DON'T!
Why? To me, it's an issue of being able to retain the value of the content.
If a set is $25, you have to rush to get it to market, because in no time flat you'll see it in every new AVS site released, every new gallery page, every free site and every paysite. It becomes over exposed in a matter of weeks, and is no longer worth $2 much less $25. If you didn't get it out the door fast enough, you're shit outta luck.
If a set is more expensive, you just don't see it around as much. A perfect example is CitiBoyz content. Didn't see it around very often until BoyContent started brokering them, and came out with their 50% off special in December. Now it's EVERYWHERE.
This is one of the reasons why I LOVE MaxPixels and their higher end sets. I've spent thousands of dollars with them, and am extremely happy that I did. I've even had other paysites e-mail me wanting to license rights to my "exclusive models". You just don't see the content out there like you do from some of the lower cost producers/brokers.
So really, I think this is a business model decision for the broker/producer than anything else. Do they want to be a walmart of content, lower prices mass volume, or a Gucci, expensive but elite.
Personally, I like Gucci.
Guys with socks on or hairy behinds. :wtf:
Greetings:
:huh:Quote:
Originally posted by Madame0120
Guys with socks on or hairy behinds. :wtf:
yeah poo bums. eww.
no samples is annoying, but easilly fixed.
Resellers refusing to identify the primary producer.
Not sticking to the same title for each set or the same stage name for each model can get confusing.
My biggest gripe is about 2257 docs. No docs, modified docs, illegible docs, docs that have been faxed and photocopied 50 times. Also docs where the signature doesn't match the release and the photo on the ID doesn't match the set (whats with that??).
i like sets where the socks stay on throughout - but then, i promote socks.