give us a few years and i think we'll all be just as ruthless as them. I think it's a natural progression when competition builds upQuote:
Originally Posted by JustMe
Printable View
give us a few years and i think we'll all be just as ruthless as them. I think it's a natural progression when competition builds upQuote:
Originally Posted by JustMe
good post JustMeQuote:
Originally Posted by JustMe
Would love it if you would respond to my icqs to you
Its like you dont love us anymore
=(
Greetings:
Haha, no, we still love you. How could we not love the ones that designed our affiliate page for us (and did a great job I might add!)Quote:
Originally Posted by forest
We're just in an in-between stage right now, and have a hold on design work. I'll hit you up when we're ready to start our next project, which should be in about a week.
Thanks again!
i've talked to a lot of sponsors about this - more people join a program offering pps. a LOT more, in some cases.
they want their money now - they don't WANT to have to rely on time to get paid. anyway, lots of programs have good retention - 3 months, for example - so the members aren't unhappy. but if you only make an average of $11 per month minus ccbill check fees etc, you still might do better financially with pps.
there are plenty of good sites you can get paid per signup. i don't think you can say that circlejerkboys sucks - it's FULL of content - but pridebucks pays per signup.
i think it's more accurate to say that most big program's sites suck inside. they sure seem to!
But Revshare is also an option with PrideBucks.Quote:
Originally Posted by basschick
revshare is also an option on almost every big program, including a lot of sites that are basically 100% plugins. a program offering revshare isn't a guaratee of retention - i've promoted a couple sites that looked good, and only converted 10% from trial to monthly.
JustMe - I totally agree with what you said, very nicely put!
xstr8guy - yes, I bet the results are very different not only with straight sites but also if you did this poll on gay site promotions on other boards too. I have a feeling all of us tend to put quality over quantity, which makes sense to pair that with revshare. For instance, how many webmasters here make their money strictly on CJ sites?
bassckick - also agree, pps sponsors attract more webmasters but imho those webmasters are usually not pushing quality or quantity (read: newbie)traffic anyway.
cheers,
Luke
luke - most of the bigger webmasters i know push pps, not revshare. i think they want their money guaranteed.
Justme, I dont really agree with you at all.Quote:
Originally Posted by JustMe
The payment methods an affiliate program chooses to use doesnt have any bearing on what the quality of there sites are going to be like.
From the webmasters perspective all it comes down to is this: do you want short term gains or do you want long term, possibly higher gains but with more risk. Maybe losing your rebills if the program goes down, or not making more than you would if you had chosen to be paid per signup.
From a members site/affiliate program persepctive it's a lot easier to setup a revshare program than PPS because they don't need to pay out such a large amount for the initial signups.
We run a few large high quality sites and we also happen to pay per signup (as well as revshare) and ummm, we make 99% of our money from rebills :) From what I've seen over the years I always thought thats how everyone did it! lol
(having said that, I HAVE seen some pretty dodgy sites in the past though!!)
IM glad to hear thatQuote:
Originally Posted by JustMe
It was a pleasure working with you but william has gotten lonley with no gay work to do
LOL
;)
Greetings:
I know, and I promised him that there were going to be some, dare I even say it, "vaginas", in his future too.... We'll see what we're moving forward with next, might need to expedite GirlAlley.com haha....Quote:
Originally Posted by forest
I am just using recurring right now but will be switching to per signup in a few weeks i think while everyone is struggling with their money because of the economy.