Army Charges 7 in Sex-For-Money Web Site

i wonder if this would be happening if they had had straight sex on a website...

"RALEIGH, N.C. - The Army has charged seven members of the celebrated 82nd Airborne Division with engaging in sex for money on a Web site, authorities said Friday.

Three of the soldiers face courts-martial on charges of sodomy, pandering and wrongfully engaging in sexual acts for money while being filmed, according to a statement released Friday by the military.

Four other soldiers, who were not named, received nonjudicial punishments.

The Army has recommended that all be discharged.

While the charges do not mention the name of the site, the division has said previously it was investigating allegations that soldiers appeared on a gay porn Web site. A spokesman for the division said Friday the charges are a result of that investigation."

http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/20060224/...borne_gay_porn

Thanks for the update, I was wondering what was happening. Sadly I'm not surprised at the outcome. :(

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by basschick

i wonder if this would be happening if they had had straight sex on a website...

---

Yes, my partner and I have been talking about that aspect.

Doubtfully as there's no homosexual conduct involved. They might get a little slap on the wrist for "conduct unbecoming..." (at least that was the little catch-all in the Canadian forces -- don't recall what it is in the U.S. but there's a similar charge.)

its ur mission bass chick 2 find that site's url lol

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by curiousbunny

its ur mission bass chick 2 find that site's url lol

---

I thought everybody knew by now that it was activeduty.com.

Yep, just saw that, look at the URL , it says ...
82nd Airborne Gay Porn
I wonder what's exactly on that tape ...

the site has no tour :kelly:

now... enquiring minds wanna know..... are these jarheads cute? pics please!

seriously on one hand my heart goes to the the servicemen involved and YEETTTTT..........

they did it of their own free will and in full knowledge of the consequences involved if the footage 'came to light'

maybe they just didn't wanna got to iraq and this was a way short of going awol.

most unfortunate for the models. :(

jim

The men are HOT and so is the site.. if you don't promote it now and you already promote Fratmen (shameless plug), here's your chance...

that being said.. there are a few things that are making me scratch my head...

The military knew about this pretty much from the beginning.. there's no way that a site that's pretty much common knowledge to every gay man with a dial-up connection isn't going to be known about by the pentagon.. I know the country is bein grun by imbicilies, but there's only limits to even THEIR incompetance..

I just wonder why they chose NOW of all times.. we're al war and there's a "Stop loss" order going on.

And they only went after 7 guys and said that was all there were... which we all know is just silly.

I'm thinking that with the new anti-don't ask don't tell movement gaining steam that they're trying to create a public outrage about how gays in the military just want to fuck all the time.

I also think that it might have something to do with how many sites there ARE with military men. And openly so. They couldn't stop the whole thing, but they've been REALLY making a big media deal out of this in an order to get the word out to other service men to not make porn. Or make porn as a way to get out of the army.

oh.. and this is not a "Sex for Money" site.. that's prostitution..

This is a porn site..

But the way that they're wording it seems to drive my point home that they're trying to stir up more anti-gay hysteria about gay service men.:wacko:

:jasun:

They're not "jarheads" (that's a nick for marines -- not paratroopers) rhys and yes they're cute. ;)

Yes, I've been promoting them. hee hee hee :pimp:

cute? definitely. There is a guy named Cole at activeduty that is about as cute as they make em, nice tats and a great big ole horsecock. I wish I could get some good promo materials, but I'm sure those are sorta under wraps for a while.

Recent focus on Hillary Clinton by the Bush administration caused her to make a statement this week that the Bush administration is trying to divert attention from this years election issues by focusing on the future presidential election and hotbutton issues.

I think Gays in the military is a hotbutton issue for sure and this timing is oh so convenient.

Has anyone noticed how smug Gonzales is in his press clips? He almost has a more "superior then thow" look then Bush does.

I wonder if the bird flu hysteria will suddenly get worse and have more focus. Politics is all games pretty sad

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Jasun

oh.. and this is not a "Sex for Money" site.. that's prostitution..

This is a porn site..

---

If you're getting paid to jerk off or have sex with other people on camera, it's sex for money, Jasun. That's how they see it anyway. To them, if you're selling sexual services for cash, you're essentially a hooker, even if you're not hanging out on street corners. Prostitution is still prostitution, even if you call it "porn." A sex worker is a sex worker.

Having said, that, I'm a BIG fan of prostitution! :)

well.. yeah.. granted.. but the way it was worded kinda tried to make it seem like they were escorts for hire... obviously, they're having sex for money.. but it's a bit different...

It was worded in a rather.. um.. hysterical(?) verbage...

By that logic all us producers are pimps. strange

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XXXWriterDude

If you're getting paid to jerk off or have sex with other people on camera, it's sex for money, Jasun. That's how they see it anyway. To them, if you're selling sexual services for cash, you're essentially a hooker, even if you're not hanging out on street corners. Prostitution is still prostitution, even if you call it "porn." A sex worker is a sex worker.

Having said, that, I'm a BIG fan of prostitution! :)

---

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Squirt

By that logic all us producers are pimps. strange

---

Aren't you? :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by XXXWriterDude

Aren't you? :)

---

No. I'm not a pimp.


pimp

n : someone who procures customers for whores (in England they call a pimp a ponce) [syn: procurer, panderer, pander, pandar, fancy man, ponce] v : arrange for sexual partners for others [syn: pander, procure]


All these labels and objectification of people isn't really productive. The Bush administration does it to make Gay people seem non human or "evil" etc. etc. Do we really need to be labeling ourselves and the people we work with?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by Squirt

No. I'm not a pimp.


pimp

n : someone who procures customers for whores (in England they call a pimp a ponce) [syn: procurer, panderer, pander, pandar, fancy man, ponce] v : arrange for sexual partners for others [syn: pander, procure]


All these labels and objectification of people isn't really productive. The Bush administration does it to make Gay people seem non human or "evil" etc. etc. Do we really need to be labeling ourselves and the people we work with?

---

Squirt, I was kidding. That's what smiley faces are for. Besides, forum discussions are for sharing ideas. And I was sharing mine.

And yeah, in a very roundabout way, those of us who are in the sex-for-money trade are variations on prostitutes and pimps. Big deal. I don't see any shame in that. To me, it's all good. In fact, it's VERY good. ;)