http://business.avn.com/articles/leg...is-485921.htmlQuote:
The second positive result was on the gay side of the industry, not tested or residing in the state of California and is completely unrelated to the first case. It is also interesting to note that the performer in the second case exclusively works on condom-only sets.
But it doesn't mean that he contracted syphilis while on set. Just means he contracted it. it is bad timing tho,
Yesterday I was asking myself "wow, they usually always try to pin everything on the gay side of the industry, when are they going to try to do it with this?"
And then that article appeared.
He probably didn't get it on set but that doesn't mean he cannot spread it on set, even if using condoms. :scared:Quote:
Originally Posted by DonnyCyber
this is all your fault. You jinxed us ;-)Quote:
Originally Posted by StunnerJesse
True, Due to the grace period of testing. It is possible. :(Quote:
Originally Posted by StunnerJesse
there was quite the outbreak up north in canada for quite some time not sure if its still big
dont you just get a shot and be done with it ;)
It used to be that simple. Now they have some strains that take a combination of a shot and meds. And some strains take more then that.Quote:
Originally Posted by StunnerDade
That's because doctors over-prescribe antibiotics.Quote:
Originally Posted by DonnyCyber
That being said, I've been on and off one antibiotic for months at a time for 15 years because it's the only thing that works for one of my problems. Still hasn't lost its effectiveness.
Should the performer in question be identified by name? Some might say this would be an invasion of privacy, but then again, due to his line of work, isn't his identity fair game for the public to know?
It's like Mitt Romney and his taxes. If he wanted to remain a private citizen we have no right to see his taxes, but because he wants to be president and will set tax and economic policy, we have a right to know about his income and investments.
It didn't take long for the straight guys name to surface and he then publicly admitted to it.Quote:
Originally Posted by sc32803
I've not heard any names on the gay performer. Or even a state other than it's not CA.
His "nym" is "Mr. Marcus"
Link to story on Huffington Post here:(Sorry..copy and paste won't work with url for some reason..but it's on the huffingtonpost.com
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/
Anyone keeping up with all of the news about this?
It's a huge disaster. Epic disaster. I don't even use the term epic.
what next condoms for oral and those mint squares for rimming roflol
May not be necessary with how far this thing may be going back.Quote:
Originally Posted by StunnerDade
I haven't seen any updates recently on the story. ps, Im glad you don't use the word "EPIC", im with you on that. ;-)
The update is that it's in Europe and here. Here they want to give everybody a shot and send them back to work in 10 days. In Europe they are waiting 60 days. Nobody seems to know who is right.Quote:
Originally Posted by DonnyCyber
US patient zero is giving conflicting interviews.
FSC/APHSS is trying to make this all TTS' fault even though they notified patient zero of his positive syphilis result.
There were photos from a scene shot back in June where patient zero had weird unidentifiable bumps/marks/sores on his dick so everybody is wondering how far it goes back and how many people may end up with it since there is such a large window to test positive.
Oh and it turns out patient zero in the US actually had stage II and not stage I syphilis.
It's a mess.
I also just read today that the World Bukkake Tour canceled their first leg stop in Barcelona due to the outbreak of syphilis. So it is having its effect.Quote:
Originally Posted by StunnerJesse
http://www.ynoteurope.com/content/15...kake-tour.html