I'm not saying that Michael Jackson is innocent, I wasn't there, I don't know. But think about this, if he is innocent, what a shitty thing to do to someone.
Printable View
I'm not saying that Michael Jackson is innocent, I wasn't there, I don't know. But think about this, if he is innocent, what a shitty thing to do to someone.
I think the family is just out for easy money
people love believing celebs did something wrong - especially weird celebs. the michael jackson thing sounds like a setup by greedy parents to me - and so did the last one. maybe he did do it, but the evidence has fallen apart, so we wouldn't know...
I think that this is just a Greedy Family that saw their chance.
Honestly, if Michael had done any of those things, he'd have been taken down LONG ago.
the more that family talks, the more they admit to lying over and over and over again. And none of the story even makes sense.
I'm kind of hoping that his records start to sell again now... I think he's suffered enough.
I think he is guilty in my opinion. We are being told specific things by the media. But I guess it's like when certain people rub you a certain way? He did - I guess there has just always been something about him that I did not like / did not trust
C'mon, the guy has admitted to sleeping with children who are not his own. "Sharing your bed is a beautiful thing" or some such nonsense. To me, that's enough to put the weirdo away for life.
I know thats f##k_up but, i really don't think he did what they are saying he did. the family has a track record of sueing peopleQuote:
Originally Posted by Xstr8guy
i think the dirty old man did it :)
I Just Have To Wonder...With All The Money That Michael Jackson Has/Had He Could Have "Paid" To Have "Playmates" And/Or Gone To "Countries" Without "Minor-Restrictions" And In A "Worse Case Scenario"(Now!) , "Paid-Off" The Complaintents Instead Of Making This So Public!
Either Innocent Or Guilty , Unlike Martha Stewart , His Career Will Never Recover , "The Damage" Is Done!:(
Sincerely ~ In Memory Of "The Jackson 5"
Personally, based on the evidence that has been presented this far in the case, if i were on the jury i would have to go with not guilty.
The kids brother has admitted lying under oath (several times), the kid himself has admitted lying under oath (several times) as well as on television for the Bashir interview, the kids mother seems to have told the kid 'what to say'.
All of that tells me that something isnt right with the accusations, if Jackson did what he has been accused of doing, the kid wouldnt have had to fabricate stories he would be able to say what happened, when it happened (within reason) and what he did after it happened especially when he was asked by a school councellor a few days after the incident supposedly took place if Jackson had 'touched him sexually' and he told the councellor that he hadnt, even after the guy tried to get the kid to say that Jackson had.
He'll get off and, im pretty sure the reason he will get off is because he didnt do it and the mother is looking for a payout.
Regards,
Lee
Yeah, but I had an aunt who used to babysit me, well, she wasn't an aunt, but a cousin we all called an aunt, anyway, she would lay down in my bed with me when it was time to go to sleep because I was scared of the dark. She wouldn't really sleep, just lay there until I was asleep and make sure I was okay. We laughed about it when we were older. My point is that it was all very innocent. I always saw Michael as a big kid himself. In his sad, bizzarre mind he may have seen it like an innocent slumber party.Quote:
Originally Posted by Xstr8guy
Although, on the other hand, I would not have allowed my child to sleep in his bed. Ya know, if I had one... like that would ever happen. LOL!~
Yeah, a big kid with a huge porn stash and an affection for "jesus juice" ;)
I have my doubts about his guilt, but what really annoys me about the whole thing is the huge amount of child molestation jokes I hear all the time now. I don't really think it's something to laugh about or make light of. It's a filthy, horrible thing, and the complete lack of taste most of the comedians have shown borders on obsene.
If he isn't guilty, it's a double shame that these false accusations have made it ok to laugh about child molestation. Maybe I'm just too uptight, but I think taste, tact, and respect have to still exist in the world to at least some tiny degree. I can't imagine what it would have been like to be molested, and I sure the fuck am not about to crack jokes about it.
i really think that MJ should trun around and sue the Da big time! The DA has had it in for him since the last case was dropped.
Jay said:
but I think taste, tact, and respect have to still exist in the world to at least some tiny degree.
You missed all that by a few generations. Bad manners and the need to push one's pvt life in the face of general public is all that seems to be left of our civilization.
And ppl wonder why I don't like to leave the house.
Well being weird isn't a crime, we all have to remember that. Most people in America would argue anyone involved in Gay Porn is weird and we would all be in jail.
It sounds like the family is just out for fame, fortune, and whatever else. At the very least I would say there is enough doubt that he should be found not guilty.
To me he just seems weird, I personally highly doubt that he is a molestor.
Regardless of guilt.. MJ has a need to be alone in an intimate setting with other peoples children, he's admitted to that much, and that's not mentally or emotionally a healthy thing to be doing.
Besides... we all know he's guilty because of that new evidence they found!
http://hektik.org/gallery/albums/MJ/...ce01.sized.jpg