Which do you prefer?

Which front page do you prefer?

www.britishtwinks.com/1
or
www.britishtwinks.com/2

ohh since you're online and on the board, Chris... i got an email from Maleflixxx about how to disable that doorway page on their site so that surfers go straight through to the movie. hit me up if ya need info on how to use it and havent already gotten that info yourself

oh and I like #2 lol

Wow, that was quick.

I'll try you on ICQ.

I'm partial to the 1st example. More imagery and less text. You know how we men are. :francais:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CashAddict

Which front page do you prefer?

www.britishtwinks.com/1
or
www.britishtwinks.com/2

---

Much prefer #1. GREAT color layout that captures the eye, plus the # of boys does that too.
But I like the evidence of the Union Jack in attendance there..plus..come on...the best part? BIG Ben! grin

I like #2.

Now, I think my prize for voting should be the home phone number of the model one the left. Seems only fair to me. :playboy:

I loved number 1. I didn't understand why you changed it. When I saw it a couple of weeks back, I thought: "Oh, that's not as exciting." Maybe it was Big Ben, it's such a good phallic symbol.

Dzinerbear

Definitely prefer no.1

Cheers,

Allan

Oh definately #1... I do like that collection...

I've been running both (randomly) for a while as an experiment.

Number 1 is pretty and shows a lot of different models.

I prefer number 2 though, as it's a bit different to what people expect a porn site to look like. It's got a more amateur feel too, which means new members tend to be more impressed when they see how much is actually inside.

Can anyone think of a disadvantage in having both and letting affiliates choose which they want to promote?

I think having both options for webmasters would be a great idea as long as its clear and easy to link to.

BTW just signed up for it but now comes the question, how does one get to your webmaster section other than what ccBill has, which is just the banners..?

I'd also perhaps list in your webmaster area the conversion ratio of each tour... so the webmaster has an idea of which is doing what...

I vote for #1, but you can certainly provide links for your affiliates to choose tour 1 or tour 2.

Tour #2 is nice but I think I prefer #1.

Big ben, the logo and the hottie on the righthand side are doing it for me. :)

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by CashAddict

I prefer number 2 though, as it's a bit different to what people expect a porn site to look like. It's got a more amateur feel too, which means new members tend to be more impressed when they see how much is actually inside.

Can anyone think of a disadvantage in having both and letting affiliates choose which they want to promote?

---

I can see why you'd try and even like #2 better then. Good idea.

I think having two tour options would be a good idea for affiliates. One might work better than the other depending on ones own traffic.

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by gaystoryman

BTW just signed up for it but now comes the question, how does one get to your webmaster section other than what ccBill has, which is just the banners..?

---

You should get a welcome e-mail with more details. Hit me up on icq (133031563) if you need anything, or e-mail me - chris@britishtwinks.com

So, a question to people who have twink traffic but aren't promoting my site yet... What's putting you off at the moment?

What can I improve to get you interested?

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by robin

Tour #2 is nice but I think I prefer #1.

Big ben, the logo and the hottie on the righthand side are doing it for me. :)

---

You know I prefer #1 as well. Although I would maybe try to think of something a little more out of the box the Big Ben. I guess that's ok.

How about the Tower of London? Well maybe not. Or a TARDIS blue police box poking up out from the models. Or the Gherkin.....

Sorry I'm in a Friday mode....

Steve

Sent you an email... :1ymca:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by desslock

Or a TARDIS blue police box poking up out from the models. Or the Gherkin.....

Sorry I'm in a Friday mode....

Steve

---

LOL! Those might work.

For sure: http://www.britishtwinks.com/1/
The other is confusing and too simple for me. :)

I like #1 is way better and shows more of what your site has to offer. The other one is just too simple.

Mark

as a designer.... it seems i like no.1 colors combi etc... but i think something missing.... :kitten:

Quote:

---

Originally Posted by robin

I can see why you'd try and even like #2 better then. Good idea.

I think having two tour options would be a good idea for affiliates. One might work better than the other depending on ones own traffic.

---

What's missing?

Personally I would go with #1...very eye-catching. Though perhaps I'm looking at it from an American perspective (the Big Ben(s) :-)) You might consider geo-targeting the second one more at Europe and the other more at America, or giving webmasters the option to select their preferred tour through linkcode or something. (Does not need to rely on making a change at CCBill, IM me if you want to do this without CCBill, not too tough so long as your server likes SQL and PHP) Nice job :-)

-doug

I like the original version myself but why not offer them both to affiliates and let them decide :)

Regards,

Lee

I'll be doing that in a few days. Once I have worked out how to do the links! :)