Photo A: Man standing next to a bird bath with a bird bathing.
Photo B: The cropped Photo A containing only the man and part of the bird bath, but no bird.
Does Photo B "contain a visual depiction" of a bird taking a bath?
According to some industry lawyers, yes. This to me doesn't make any sense. Frankly, I don't know as if I'm buying it. I'll take it as their "safe no risk" answer.
If it really is to be followed then it's yet another of those things that have always been in 2257 in terms of secondary keeping documents that nobody has followed for years. Where were the lawyers then? I never heard any lawyer mention this until the past week. What's up with that?
Bookmarks