Is an ass 2257 compliant?

[IntenseCash.com]

Here is an example on a banner..

[JustMe]

Uh-oh!

sexually explicit, you're going to jail!
:honest:

[Squirt]

I think the banner ass you showed is more compliant then this one

[MWCren]

AAAAAAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH !!!!!
I'm scarred for life.

That is just nasty, squirt.

[tombarr]

Now I have seen the definition of obscenity.

[Chilihost]

if you weren't gay already, that pic is a converter!!!

cheers,
Luke

[IntenseCash.com]

if you weren't gay already, that pic is a converter!!!

cheers,
Luke

Yeah I think you're right. LOL

[djdez]

Mark. An ass of itself we are considering to not fall under the 2257. The picture you posted could be classified as simulated sex as it looks like the tounge doesn't touch the hiney. However, I think a case could be made though that it is a depiction of anal-oral conduct which would fall under 2257. Personally, as an affiliate I would not use the banner.