Results 1 to 6 of 6

Thread: Here's what we'd have to put up with if the DOJ wins...

  1. #1
    Matt D
    Guest

    Here's what we'd have to put up with if the DOJ wins...

    I found a link to an interesting article on the 2257. It includes a section for comments. Check out the last post from an anti-porn jackass...

    Written By:Kip Watson
    On June 22, 2005 11:42 PM
    Hey smut-merchants,
    I know you sick freaks think that your right to free speech entitles you to spam me and my family non-stop with graphic porn, and I sure am crying that you should be expected to contribute ever so slightly to the prevention of extremely serious sex crimes (oh my, what an imposition). After all, you all tell yourselves that your disgusting and degrading product is a good thing, so the fury and outrage it engenders must be due to someone else's unreasonable hang-ups, right?

    So my question is: if I decided that carving my initials in your face with a chainsaw was a legitimate form of my self expression, would it make it acceptable to you if I repeatedly told myself that on balance it wasn't causing any harm?
    A link to the article:

    Cracking Down on Porn: Protecting Children or Naked Censorship?
    http://www.acsblog.org/bill-of-right...ensorship.html

    More proof that the "porn is harmful" crowd are a bunch of fucking sex-hating psychotics. Norman Bates is the poster child for those people.


  2. #2
    Matt D
    Guest
    More comments from Kip Watson, the psychotic porn hater:

    Oh sure, Smut-pusher,
    'Cause your right to cr#p on society as long as there's something in it for ya is sacred, but if others think they have a right to define what sort of society they think is healthy and good, for them and their kids? - "Are you kidding??!! What is this, the Taliban??!!"

    I think it's great that porn-scum should have their addresses made public (as do respectable businesses - we don't seek to hide what we do). Y'know I wouldn't want you to think you can sleep soundly in my neighbourhood.
    I can't believe the pro-censorship crowd can get away with a "porn causes violence" argument with Little Normans like this psycho in their midst. Here we have a man (or woman) who hates porn, threatening to chainsaw any porn producer that moves into their neighborhood.


  3. #3
    Hot guys & hard cocks Squirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,193
    Pretty pathetic !

    It's these same people that feel everyone should own a gun to keep the blacks from breaking into their house or raping their daughters... cause only Daddy can do that. They are sick people. It's guys like this that buy a subscription to your porn site and then charge it back after sending you an email saying they didn't like one of your 300 videos and want a refund >
    Naked Straight Men on Squirtit & StraightBro

    ~ In Production ~

    Blindfoldmen.com
    scifimen.com


  4. #4
    Hot guys & hard cocks Squirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,193
    What do you think of my response to him? :short:
    Naked Straight Men on Squirtit & StraightBro

    ~ In Production ~

    Blindfoldmen.com
    scifimen.com


  5. #5
    Matt D
    Guest
    Heh! That was you? He just keeps digging himself a deeper and deeper hole. The guys a total nutjob.


  6. #6
    On the other hand.... You have different fingers
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    Hollywood, CA
    Posts
    3,639
    Typical of these types. Sex is a terrible thing but all disagreements can be solved with violence. Their stance seems to be: You can't made adult entertainment but I can come to your house and cause you harm and that is okay.

    This country really scares me sometimes.
    Don Mike
    DonMikeCali@gmail.com


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •