US Supreme & File Sharing

[gaystoryman]

Interesting... the US Supreme court ruled that the case involving gokstar should be revisited and that there are grounds for them being liable for damages for allowing illegal file sharing.

CBC News Article

Strange differences as the Canadian Supreme court ruled that the music industry could not have access to ISP accounts on the same basis that the US allowed it.

So if a company can be held liable for what its members do online, wonder how soon before the DOJ will suddenly stop exempting ISPs from 2257 violations?

A stretch I know, but possible... or not? :gossip:

[DonMike]

Don't get people started, gaystoryman. LOL! We have enough speculation going on without people worrying about something new that hasn't even been thought of yet.

[gaystoryman]

yeah but then we can get to 100K posts all that much sooner... :goof:

[DonMike]

You wicked wicked man. LOL!

[jal36]

There is alot that we have to deal with now. With out having a through the so called grape vine talk about the 2257 thing. and it is just terrible at what thay are doing...... :nowords:

P.S. Don the guy at Ounique has a bolt loose the one that took you place.
I no longer buy from them anymore. :joker:

[Lee]

See i have no problems with filesharing networks being held accountable for the infringement of copyrighted materials.

Regards,

Lee

[DonMike]

There is alot that we have to deal with now. With out having a through the so called grape vine talk about the 2257 thing. and it is just terrible at what thay are doing...... :nowords:

P.S. Don the guy at Ounique has a bolt loose the one that took you place.
I no longer buy from them anymore. :joker:

Yikes! I saw Gregory the other day and he was doing well. I'm sure they are going crazy with all this record keeping stuff these days as well.