Can you believe it? I don't know what to think. Michael Jackson was the very first cassette tape I bought when I was like 10. What are your thoughts on the verdicts?
Mark
Can you believe it? I don't know what to think. Michael Jackson was the very first cassette tape I bought when I was like 10. What are your thoughts on the verdicts?
Mark
* IntenseCash.com - If you can't convert us you better look for a new job!
Who DIDN'T have Thriller?!?
Good.
I have been given some faith in the US legal system now.
For them to have found him guilty really would have been a crime, i dont like the guy, i think he is weird but, at the same time, being weird isnt a crime.
Plus, all the evidence was circumstantial anyway.
Regards,
Lee
Circumstantial evidence didn't stop the jury from convicting Scott Peterson.
Now he can go back to molesting more young boys. :wacko:
Right and that was about the time my faith in the legal system started dwindling.Originally Posted by Xstr8guy
Perhaps Peterson should have had Jacko's jury instead, they actually seemed to know a bit about the 'beyond reasonable doubt' aspect of a trial
Regards,
Lee
I don't think MJ will be quite so fortunate if this comes to bat for a 3rd Inning!
Be it he is or he isn't guilty, MJ needs to keep little boys out of his house and out of his bed.
He has a theme park in his backyard... if he wants to spread smiles, laughter and love (and not little boys legs), let him do it in the theme park, not in his house.
PapaBear
Just look at one of the two books they found when searching his house. It is legal to own and is a depiction of the making of the movie "Lord of the Flies" so don't get freaked out by the link to the Google search results. If you click the second link those are some of the pics from the book. I think they are not appropriate and should be illegal. It is obviuosly soft kore K*porn in my opinion. Why it's legal is beyond me.
It's when I saw the photos from that book I realized he had an affinity for naked boys and that these alligations, coupled with him sleeping with boys, coupled with him owning photos of naked boys, coupled with past alligations, means he's guilty.
The problem in this case was the credibility of the accusers mother and the accuser. He may not have done it to this boy, but my gut tells me he's done it with others.
They didn't say he wasn't guilty, just not beyond a reasonable doubt :thumbsup:
I don't think Michael Jackson's a *********, I don't think he had sex with those kids. I think he's a fucked up adult who is some way thinks he still a kid or at the very least doesn't view himself as an adult.
dzinerbear
Did you read my post above and see the pictures one of the books he owns contains? If it wasn't michael jackson.. and was your neighbor, or a guy down the street... who'd been accused before, who sleeps with preteen boys, who owns books with naked preteen boys in them, and who was being accused again.. would you think the same thing, or is michael jacksons public persona in such conflict with the evidence that you can't consolidate the two?
I "think" he is guilty of "previous" child molestation charges. He shouldn't b sharing his bed with children. He built neverland ranch as a bait. I think if the mom of the acusser would of kept her mouth shut during the trial maybe he would of been found guilty. Her past in that JCPenny incident am sure had alot 2 do with it. The jurors have now said they didnt like her at all. She kept snapping fingers at them and making "weird" eye contact. In my opinon he likes to molest children. Why else would you sleep with children? Why is he not with a chick or a grown gay man ? I hope he learns his lesson.
YES I was watching that too how they said they were offended that she was staring at them constantly and snapping her fingers at them. One jurer said when she snapped her fingers at them she thought to herself "Don't you snap your fingers at me lady!" Pretty telling.
People don't sleep with other peoples children. Good parents don't give their children for other adults to sleep with. I can understand wanting to be like a kid again etc etc but my gut, and the evidence, tells me he's guilty.. or is coming close to doing it, and the thing that pushed me over that edge in that direction was seeing the pictures of those naked boys laying together, etc etc that he owned in those books. He was grooming kids if nothing else. No verdict in this case is a good one. It's a sad situation all the way round.
Exactly. if he really loves children in a non-sexual way why doesnt he sleep with his own children? He is a father or so he says. He should focus his attention on his old children. In that one interview he gave abc once he said "it feels good to have someone in bed" that's why he sleep with children. Well sleep with your own ! If I caught him with my nephew in bed id shoot him LOL.
Squirt,
We own a gun, does that mean we are automatically guilty of murder if we got accused?
Owning something legal or not, does not mean that any person is guilty of a crime until proven so in a court of law beyond a reasonable doubt.
Now on the other hand, would i like Jackson near any of the kids i know? Not in a million years.
The mother should now be put on trial for wasting MILLIONS of dollars of tax payers money.
Regards,
Lee
Of course not.. that's obsurd. That's like saying owning a knife means you're automatically guilty of stabbing someone to death if accused. :wacko:
Exactly. I believe in our court sytem. It worked for me, thank God. No public lynching. The key here is "beyond a reasonable doubt" and the moment the mother took the stand and testified.. there was reasonable doubt. When her dubious past came into light.. there was resaonable doubt.
Right... because common sense tells you that you don't want you child around a man that has pictures of naked boys playing and laying together, touching eachother, nore would you want any children you know sleeping with him.
They didn't claim Jackson Innocent beyond a reasonable doubt.. they found that there is reasonable doubt he didn't do it.
I think she'll have her hands full with the state welfare system and JC Penny hopefully. I know when my case was thrown out I could have sued, and won, against the school district, the psycho who took me to court, and an insurance company.. but I just wanted it done. 9 months worrying about if the system will work, getting evidence, taped depositions, TV interviews etc etc.. you just want to get back to normal period. That's why I initially came to Australia.. to recharge my batteries. I wonder where Michael Jackson will go? What do you think he'll do?
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks