Settling over correcting

[Happysucks]

Looking over a lot of content I’ve come to believe producers will settle for model flaws rather than go through the set they just took and remove the zits and boils from someone’s ass.

Now maybe it’s just me but the sight of a hot or semi hot guy/girl with acne is just not worth joining. All this says is there is going to be more sets of the same thing.

Who knows?

[BritishTwinks]

A lot of our members like the flaws. They don't want well-lit, air brushed pretty-boys - they want to see what the boy next door *really* looks like naked. The amateurish style is so much more popular than pro pics.

[thetwink]

yeah, it really does depend on the type of guy the site is offering... take Workin' Men Movies, for example... if there were pics in the member's area, then you can bet that correcting flaws like that would not go over very well... but for a site like Randy Blue, I can see where removing some flaws would help keep with the 'glamour' image of the site.

Yes, I know glamour invokes a feminine feeling, but I'm up early today and my brain isn't fully working yet,

[BritishTwinks]

I think it's amazing what good angles and good lighting can do to improve a guy. I sometimes meet one of our models for the first time and can't believe he's the same guy I've been jerking off over!

I'm all for good angles and good lights, not so much for airbrushing and stuff.

[Chilihost]

I agree with thetwink, it depends on the site and what is being offered. Amateur site surfers obviously want to see those flaws, but a pornstar site might want to cover them up.

variety is good!

cheers,
Luke

[basschick]

as far as content that is for sale, i don't expect a producer to go through and correct a set of pics that i am only spending $20 on. for that price, i'll go correct 'em