Who is using NATS and what is your cascades

[Greg Gaskell]

I'm doing CCBILL, IBILL and passwords by phone and in that order.

be interesting to see who is doing what

[basschick]

worked with a program using NATS for around a year. used epoch --> ccbill --> check and picked up 12% extra signups over a single processor with or without check.

[fallen]

I use ccBill -> paycom -> 2000Charge (with GeoTarget) -> GXBill

[IntenseCash.com]

We usually have ours at paycom -> ccbill -> ccbill900 and for checks
electracash -> wts -> ccbill900. We are adding in 2000Charge to get the foreign users.

Mark

[gaybucks_chip]

I hope your luck with 2000 charge is better than ours. They ripped us off for $300 and in spite of numerous conversations with Iris, promises by Wolf and intercession by somebody else, we've never seen the money, any interest in paying it, or even any interest in trying to make things right.

We're soon going to go small claims simply on the principle of the thing... the $300 they held has already cost them way more than that in lost business from us.

I'd say be very careful.

[IntenseCash.com]

I hope your luck with 2000 charge is better than ours. They ripped us off for $300 and in spite of numerous conversations with Iris, promises by Wolf and intercession by somebody else, we've never seen the money, any interest in paying it, or even any interest in trying to make things right.

We're soon going to go small claims simply on the principle of the thing... the $300 they held has already cost them way more than that in lost business from us.

I'd say be very careful.

That is strange I have never had a problem with them. We actually used them before when we were on the mpa software. Coming from you though I will defintely keep my eye on them.

Mark