I was just updating my google adsense campains and i used the word twinks in one of the titles for my sites . google came back and said they are no longer accepting sites with the word twinks in them !!!!
here is the exact reply google posted to me:
"We do not allow ad text including 'twink' to run on Google at this time. Please remove this inappropriate language from your ad, and we will be happy to run your ad on Google."
Last edited by collegeboyslive; 05-07-2006 at 10:36 AM. Reason: adding info
Video feeds and content available to webmasters:
http://demo.collegeboyslive.com http://affiliates.collegeboyslive.com
Does look like they must have just banned that word, because I still see some ad words under it. I said it before if you own any type of twink site I would watch out, once they are allowed to block the word “boy” the sky will be the limit on this one. Ccbill is not google but how long do you think it will be before they will try to block the word "twink" or any other term you can use do describe a person 18-24. If you run a twink site that has Ccbill or a US processor, I would start thinking about changing that NOW they are going to fuck you, and not in a good way! :honest:
Ah ... it must have something to do with this:
http://xbiz.com/news_piece.php?id=14783
MOUNTAIN VIEW, Calif. – Google took it on the chin this week after being sued by a Nassau County legislator for allegedly profiting off child pornography through its search engine.
In his complaint, filed in New York Supreme Court, Jeffrey Toback, (D-Oceanside), alleges that Google has profited handsomely off the dissemination of child porn and that it is an “integral part” of its business structure.
The complaint fingers Google as "the largest and most efficient facilitator and distributor of child pornography in the world.”
Toback is aiming to block Google from providing links or advertising to websites that display child pornography and to come clean with the fact that it has made billions of dollars off child porn and other “obscene” content through sponsored links.
The complaint, however, did not make a clear distinction between content that specifically features underage performers or victims and adult content.
Toback added further that Google has taken no action to curb its involvement in the so-called spread of child porn even though it is fully capable of blocking certain search terms, as evidenced by its involvement with the Chinese Government.
"Defendant is willing to accede to the demands of the Chinese autocrats to block the search term 'democracy,'" the complaint states, "but when it comes to the protection and well-being of our nation's innocent children, Defendant refuses to spend a dime's worth of resources to block child pornography from reaching children."
Google executives were quick to counter Toback’s claims by saying that when the search engine is made aware of any affiliation to sites that market child pornography, they are quick to report it to law enforcement, and that the company does everything it can to combat child porn.
No other search engines were named in the complaint, and Toback has not expressed interest in pursuing other companies over similar allegations.
Toback is best known for his efforts to raise the legal age to 19 for buying tobacco and for proposing a domestic partner registry for the state of New York.
You give these fuckers a foot hold by backing this supposed CP resection and they will never stop! If they want to report CP sites that’s fine, but to block words is not, when are people going to start seeing what is going on? My guess is when it bites you in the Ass! :mental:
Unless I'm mistaken, they haven't allowed that for a while? They accept "boys" though, go figure. Though that may vary on context.
I think twinks can still be used as a keyword at least.
It would be interesting to see if they allow use of the word "chicken." My guess is that the dumbasses making the decisions probably are allowing chicken and not allowing twink
Now I wonder if the next step is to remove "twink" from their search engine results?
who exactly do you think "these fuckers" are, though?
Originally Posted by maxpower
These Family First Groups, Christian Fundamentalist, Conservative Republicans ECT that are using the whole CP thing to gain votes, support their base, and push their real goal of making it increasingly harder to make a living. I think the companies that many of us support with our hard earned dollars are also enabling these fuckers to get way with this BS :boo:
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks