From time to time we become embroiled in a bareback sex debate, and the teams pile up on both sides of the debate.
I was just looking at one of the big gay porn glossy magazines. Lots of pictures of hard condomless cocks pushed up against butt holes. And then further into the shoot we are treated to the simulated fuck scenes -- one guy on top of the other in a fucking position. We don't actually see any cocks in holes, but we actually never see a condom on a cock either, not even a condom wrapper on the bed beside the couple.
So, is it bareback sex only if you're actually seeing a bare cock in a butt hole? And if you're implying bareback sex, or at least not confirming the models are engaging in condomed-sex, isn't that sending out an irresponsible message, too? I could pretty much guarantee if we took the exact same shoot in that magazine (picture for picture) and just renamed it "Bareback Afternoon Fuck," there would be an outcry. Seems a bit hypocritical to me.
Michael
Bookmarks