Gay Interacial

[TopBucks_Juan]

Well it seems like TopBucks, among other companies has been given a bad review on their gay interracial sites. Which could be a good thing....just as long as those who are making comments about it are at least giving some sort of suggestions as to how one might be able to improve in that area, and not just criticizing them.

So here's your opportunity to go ahead and let down your hair. Go ahead and criticize, but make sure to make suggestions as well.

Who's first?

Here is a link for you to view our content: Gay Interracial

[Lee]

If you could post a couple of no console links that would be great Juan

Regards,

Lee

[AusCoding Allan]

Site layouts are great, graphics are clean and sharp and the general appearance is good, but I like single exit consoles only.

Cheers,

[desslock]

Juan:

What were the problems specified with the GayInterracial site by the critics? Well I just looked at your site, and as someone who is really into "that combination" I can tell you that technically the website is fine.

However, I'd say that the looks of the models are a little uneven. The black guys I saw looked cool.

However, I want to take some of those white guys and feed them a cheeseburger. Also the blatino guys are ok, but that particular selection doesn't really rev my engines. The latinos on your main page and on your movies sampler page have no butts. (In my book, I mark that as The Kiss of Death)

Lots of those latinos on your site possess the "thug look" --- which I guess can be popular, however I'd suggest that you add some different looks. I've recently reviewed some gay porn movies made in Florida or South Cal which cast latinos that have Cuban or Mexican features - they are very different from that New York-Thug-Rican look. Maybe you can find content with those other types of guys.

This is actually a problem that I often find with the porn industry, and I think there's a large untapped potential for using these different kinds of guys.

I hope that's what you are looking for. I was just looking at it as what me and my other Pedrophile friends here would probably observe when deciding on whether to pull out our credit card on your site.

Steve

[basschick]

okay, first the dark blue and black backround doesn't really go with the pink, orange and red text and tables.

but MOST important is the text - i don't care for the first person text on a non-reality site, and it is not really interracial text. also there could be less of it for each episode.

in my opinion, phrases like "love making" and "piss hole" are weird and not very sexy for this niche. a reference to incest on the page is distasteful. "I told him my older cousin made me suck his dick once."

what about text like "White men who love sucking BIG BLACK COCKS!"
"Gay Interracial Gangbang" "First time white guys try black dick"
"See HUGE BLACK DICKS penetrate tight white asses" "Ebony stud drinks a load of white cum"

text like this sends great hits from my galleries and avs sites.

i feel that the site text, whether on the episodes or the text at the top of the site, do not stay focused. it is more general gay text than focused on the important theme of the site. for example
CLICK HERE watch WILLIAM get FUCKED in our SAMPLE VIDEO NOW!
does not say anything about the interracialness of the video. or just look at the text on the top of this page: http://www.gayinterracialxxx.com/s2/pictures.html

okay, i've had my say. now i have to close the site and recover from the popups.

[jIgG]

ok here goes
don't be trowin'any tomatoes at me though


the site itself is ok, im not too crazy about the design but at least it's straight forward with the content.

which i'm sorry to say i dont like.
now i probably look at it from a different angle, since I've seen a lot of porn both working with it and surfing for it, some of these sets are old and have been in newsgroups and yahoo groups and wherever else for a while now. The colors aren't good, there's nothing original in this site that would make me whip out my card and pay, unless I was really really horny and just had to see something anything

i've also seen the insides of most of topbucks' sites and well they really suck. only 2 galleries in the advertised niche, with plugins filling the rest of the site isn't going to make me spend $39,95 a month, sorry.



my 2c

[pornwatcher]

Juan,

Since were on a Top Buck issue here does Top Buck offer console free to pomote.
Thanks.

[basschick]

i'm not juan, but yes - topbucks does. after you select which tour to promote on the linking dropdown, on the right, you can select no console.

[TopBucks_Juan]

These are all valid and acceptable complaints and suggestion. Believe me when I say that they are well noted. I hope that other companies have seen this thread and have taken note as well. Thank you.