Child Pornographers + Theives

[Lee]

Please take this as a public warning that one of the 'newest' gay webmaster forums is populated by site owners pushing child porn / pseudo child porn as well as script theives in addition to using domains that are going to attract pedos to their sites.

I was told i should make this info public after someone found this out the hard way for themselves.

I would urge you to check out any webmaster board you are going to be posting on, on a regular basis to make sure that your business is protected.

Doing some due-dilligence is always a good thing in any business, dont say that you werent warned

Regards,

Lee

[collegeboyslive]

well dotn just give us 1/2 the story. which one is it? name names

[Lee]

In this instance, half the story is better than non of the story.

As i said, if you are planning on posting on boards regularly, particularly new boards, just make sure you check on the people that are posting there in addition to the type of sites and content they promote.

There havent been that many new boards for the gay market launched in the last few months so that should narrow the list down a fair bit

Regards,

Lee

[Lee]

Thanks for pointing that out Lee, went back and checked.. your absolutly right.

Indeed, when it comes to stuff like this it doesnt pay to be 'wrong' because that could be very costly

Thankfully, the more reputable gay boards are there in addition to GWW where webmasters can find alternate help if they want it like U360, GMS, GWC etc

Regards,

Lee

[basschick]

i'd say this applies to ALL boards, not just gay ones or webmaster ones.

it's good to really get an idea of what goes on before signing up - at least, imo. i try to check posts by a number of posters in business, political and fun topics so i get a feel for the people and whether the board and i will be a good fit.

[IdolKnights]

Bass: Would you sign up for a board that required membership to access the board itself? One you could not read before you did?

[marcjacob]

can someone pm me who it is, i have no idea.

[marcjacob]

also like to point out im a SURFER board and lee aint talking about me! (my content is mainly sponsor so far anyway with 2257 docs

[dannyz]

This is the thread I think Lee is talking about:
http://www.ingayporn.com/forum/index...pic,528.0.html

Lee is basing this all on one thread you can go and read and decide for yourself instead of going by Lee's word.

[marcjacob]

Ive read the first the two pages, alot more to go but its seems to me that this accusation is about young looking models. the guy doesnt have to follow 2257, hes not in the usa. i agree with that. the pics have been removed so i cant judge for myself. but i see no eveidence that these are cp pics. also woth noting that they are sponsor pics.

also for what its worth, the admin of this board was arguing against the site and i didnt see much evidence of it being a cp board, quite the reverse.

looks like a witch hunt to me.

[realtoughbear]

Well,

Lee you are NOT FUCKING angel.

Why don't you explain you 2257 violations?

Wgu don't you explain your 2257 page?


http://www.us2257.com/

Records Officer.
1458 Oceanshore Blvd
Suite 140
Ormond Beach,
Florida, 32176.

Ummmmmm

Shipping Depot
(386) 441-3714
1458 Ocean Shore Blvd, Ormond Beach, FL

You own a shipping Depot now?

And then you have the guts to say for more info please visit here and link to GWW with a hover over saying FOR CURRENT 2257 INFO PLEASE VISIT GWW!

Since when was having the custodians of recoreds for 25+ paysites at a shipping depot current?

I think your actions clearly in this matter show how desperate you are into tricking webmasters into coming to GWW for information that is NOT correct. And it is obvious that you are willing to stoop to low levels to hurt other boards.

This is just the beginning of many posts I will make on other boards showing what you have done.

[gaybucks_chip]

looks like a witch hunt to me.

Or a desire to curb competition. If it were a genuine issue of concern, it seems like the right thing to do (for the industry as well as for the board owner) would be to privately message the board owner and raise the concerns, rather than trash the board in a thinly veiled way. But that's just me.

[basschick]

only if i knew the owner and some of the posters - and i don't think i ever did sign up for a board that i couldn't see first. when i signed up here, it was able to read the posts, although i believe that is no longer the case.

Bass: Would you sign up for a board that required membership to access the board itself? One you could not read before you did?

[realtoughbear]

also for what its worth, the admin of this board was arguing against the site and i didnt see much evidence of it being a cp board, quite the reverse.

looks like a witch hunt to me.

That is exactly what it is. You guys look at which board is taking the high ground and decide for yourselfs... It's pretty clear to me.

[samebb]

Well seems the owner of this board is in violation of something. Seems some people have hit a soft spot bringing up his non 2257 compliancy.

OH DEARRRR

If all he can do is throw threats at me, and companies with no connection to me, then he needs help.

Good luck to all of you :turddance: