Are these images to big for a tour

[Squirt]

Your honest opinion please, no bullshit. Do you think this move will get sales?

http://www.squirtit.com/html/samualjohnsonp.html

http://www.squirtit.com/html/troyp.html

http://www.squirtit.com/html/willhun..._jack_off.html

http://www.squirtit.com/html/peteii_...ck_porn_v.html

http://www.squirtit.com/html/cameronp.html

What are your thoughts?

Am I giving away to much?

And what are your thoughts on the different versions of the Squirtit.com watermark?

[webnet]

I like the big and clean pictures.

[Xstr8guy]

A very knowledgable little bird told me that big images sell well.

My next tour is going to have big images.

[vs eddie]

Great clarity on the photos!

[Axel]

It's good to have a few large pictures. But not too many... for instance, I wouldn't put large pics with a hard cock in...or I would blurred them to make people who really like the model, paying when they do want to see the hard cock.

For watermark, I prefer classical Samual Johnson style

Axel

[DEVELISH]

I love big pictures - But I love WIDE pictures even more

But... you already know that, squirt

DEVELISH

[basschick]

a buddy of mine tried smaller pics and pics the size you're showing us on his tour. he tested a serious lot of traffic each way and the bigger pics made a huge amount more sales.

sometimes bigger really IS better

[Xstr8guy]

sometimes bigger really IS better

Oh yeah... most of the time!

[Lee]

Yup big pics work well like Jim and Patti said.

Im actually starting to watch more and more sponsors and more and more of them are actually 'testing' their tours and opting to go with larger images.

Regards,

Lee

[Squirt]

Thanks a lot for the people who've posted in this thread thus far I really appreciate you taking the time to give me some feedback.

Anyone else have some input? Don't be shy :vanish: