Results 1 to 11 of 11

Thread: Possible 2257 violator that worked as Tampa exec director of the expressway system

  1. #1
    LiveTwinksCam.com LiveTwinksCam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    869

    Possible 2257 violator that worked as Tampa exec director of the expressway system

    Porn Sites Might Not Comply With Law
    By JOHN W. ALLMAN and LINDSAY PETERSON The Tampa Tribune
    http://news.tbo.com/news/nationworld/MGBYDDYJDUE.html
    Published: Nov 11, 2006

    TAMPA - A gay pornographic video company in San Diego owned by Ralph Mervine may be in violation of a federal law specifying how and where an adult business keeps records documenting the age of its performers.

    Mervine, 55, resigned Wednesday from his $208,000 job as executive director of the Tampa-Hillsborough County Expressway Authority. He quit shortly after being confronted by Tampa Tribune reporters about his affiliation with Coast Productions.

    Documents on file in San Diego County list Mervine as the sole owner of Coast Productions.

    The company is affiliated with at least two Web sites, coastguys .com and coastproductions.com, that sell DVDs produced by Coast Productions or offer monthly memberships to view photos and video clips. Both sites cater to customers who are seeking young men ages 18 to 21, called "twinks," who the Web sites say have never been on film before.

    The federal rule requires Web sites carrying sexually explicit videos or photographs to keep records of the performers' names and dates of birth.

    The home pages of Coast's Web sites include links to a statement about the record-keeping rule, known in the industry as Section 2257.

    The link lists "D. Stone" at 3841 Fourth Ave., Suite 243, San Diego, as the custodian of records. That address also is listed on the Coast Production business documents filed with San Diego County.

    But that address is a mailbox at Hillcrest Postal Services, for which Coast pays $180 a year, Hillcrest owner John Nettles said.

    "That could be a problem," said Lawrence G. Walters, an Altamonte Springs lawyer who represents the owners of several adult Web sites.

    The address must be a real place, Walters said. "The government wants to know where to go to look at these records." They want to be able to see performers' pictures, legal names, stage names and dates of birth.

    "You can't have a P.O. Box," said Paul Cambria, a criminal defense lawyer in Beverly Hills, Calif., and a leading expert on Section 2257. His clients include Hustler magazine founder Larry Flynt and the Adult Video News.

    A postal box "totally frustrates the whole system because there's no place to go," Cambria said. "The whole idea is to be able to actually look at records. You can't do that if you walk up to a P.O. Box."

    "Without a doubt," a company would be in violation, Cambria said, if they listed a postal box as the address where records are kept.

    Mervine could not be reached for comment Friday.

    FBI Has Inspected Some Businesses
    Written several years ago, the law recently was amended to more clearly address record-keeping requirements for Web-based content.

    Noncompliance with the law is a felony offense and can result in a five-year prison term.

    An adult-entertainment industry group, the Free Speech Coalition, has filed a federal lawsuit to have parts of the law's record-keeping provisions thrown out, saying they violate the First Amendment.

    Despite the challenge, the FBI recently started inspecting adult businesses to determine compliance with the law, Cambria said.

    The law also is specific about naming a person to maintain the records.

    "You have to have a real person as the custodian," Cambria said. "They have to be readily identifiable."

    Tribune reporters have been unable to locate the person listed as the Coast contact, "D. Stone." The site does not provide a phone number. There are more than 15 listings in the San Diego area that match that first initial and last name.

    The law also states the records must be accessible at least 20 hours a week.

    Walters said Coast might also be in violation of the law by using someone other than the owner as a records custodian.

    "The way the law reads, the producer of the material needs to maintain the records," he said. If the company is incorporated, it could name a custodian. If it's run by an individual, "then the sole proprietor is responsible for maintaining the records. It's unclear whether he would be able to designate another person."

    Coast is not incorporated. Its business records filed with the San Diego County recorder list only Mervine as the owner.

    Coast's Web site says it has been making DVDs since 1996. Softec Internet Services, a company in Cocoa, in Brevard County, provided it with technical support for several years, company owner Ferrell Ard said.

    Ard said Mervine provided content to Softec and was the company's contact.

    About a month ago, Ard said, he received an e-mail from Mervine saying Coast Productions was moving to a new Internet service provider. Ard said the e-mail wasn't from Mervine's expressway authority address.

    Ard said the e-mail was short. "I really don't even know the person. We just put the content on the server and provided it to the world."

    Company Address Changed In 2004
    Mervine filed for a fictitious name for Coast Productions in 1999. He renewed the name in 2003 and 2004. The 2004 renewal included amending the company's address to his home address in Mulberry, in Polk County. That address change would not affect the records requirement because the custodian's address still is San Diego.

    Coastproductions.com has been inactive since Wednesday night. Coastguys.com remained active as of Friday. The compliance statement, however, is no longer viewable because it is linked to the Web site that is no longer in service.

    The law exists to protect companies such as Mervine's because it requires proof of a performer's age, plus other pertinent identifying information such as aliases, nicknames or professional names used by individual performers.

    "If you're dealing with younger people, you have a greater chance of someone being underage than you do if someone is 40," Cambria said. "You have to be vigilant."

    Activist Wants To Raise Age Requirement
    William Margold, an adult film star and activist for the industry, said he has pushed to raise the age for first-time performers in adult films to 21.

    Margold said he thinks a company that promotes youthful content has a responsibility to be more diligent.

    "They should be even more on top of their game," he said. "If they have bragged about that, they better live up to that."

    Coast Productions purports to have the youngest performers possible. One DVD description states that the actor is on camera a day after his 18th birthday.

    "Coast Productions has the hottest, sexiest young twink models from the age of 18 to 21 that are currently available," one Web site states.

    Federal penalties are severe for individuals who do not comply with the record requirements. That includes anyone who produces, manufactures or publishes adult material.

    "Whoever violates this section shall be imprisoned for not more than 5 years," the code states, "and fined in accordance with the provisions of this title, or both."

    There has been one prosecution.

    In September, the California producer of "Girls Gone Wild" videos pleaded guilty to failing to keep age records and to not labeling the DVDs as being in compliance with the law.

    Joseph Francis and his two companies agreed to pay the government $2.1 million.

    Reporter John W. Allman can be reached at jallman@tampatrib.com or (813) 259-7915
    Thanks,
    Jacob

    Add HOT Live Feeds to your site!
    www.LiveTwinksCam.com/webmasters.html


  2. #2
    On the other hand.... You have different fingers
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    3,548
    I totally don't get this. Yes, it's very clearly a technical 2257 violation, and yes there's jail time attached to this sort of violation, but nobody in the article seems even REMOTELY concerned with whether the model IDs are in order and the models are of age, which is what's really important here.

    If the Tampa Tribune thinks they've made a gigantic revelatory discovery in finding one website operating from a PO box, they're pretty naive. I would guess there are thousands of sites out there that (illegally) are using PO boxes.

    Oh, and Softec Internet Services is Badpuppy's mainstream internet division, so I'm sure that at least the content supplied to Badpuppy (referenced indirectly in the article) is legal, since I know Badpuppy is very up on compliance.

    So why is the Tribune making such a big fucking deal? Why didn't newspapers make a big deal when the distributor of a major DVD studio had to pull 4 DVDs because there was an alleged underage model? That's FAR more serious than having a PO box address in my book.


  3. #3
    JustMe
    Guest
    I feel the need to jump in here and supply my two cents as well.

    What bothers me most about this article isn't the fact that the Tampa based newspaper decided to write it the in first place. It's an excuse for them to announce to the world that HEY, executive director of the Tampa-Hillsborough County Expressway Authority is a fag and sells porn! It's a story about sex, which of course sells newspapers. No big shocker there.

    What bothers me the most are the comments coming from Cambria and Walters. What in the HELL are 2 of our industry's most well known DEFENSE attorneys doing publicly speculating about whether or not an adult site is violating the law?!?!

    Fine, be a media whore and all, good for them, but at the public expense of someone in the industry? I think not.

    What Walters and Cambria SHOULD have said is something like "I can't speculate on whether any given company may or may not be breaking the complex 2257 laws. What I can say, is that the way the law was written, it's virtually impossible for ANYONE to follow it to the letter, which is why the Free Speech Coalition has filed suit against the federal government seeking to have the law thrown out."

    And then maybe went on to talk a little bit about the ASACP and our industry's efforts to battle the real enemy, CP.

    This just outrages me.

    Sure, everyone should know that you can't use a PO Box by now, it's been widely discussed. But let's not ignore the fact that there are many parts of the 2257 law which are virtually impossible to comply with (such as archiving every live cam show ever done in its entirety and storing it for 7 years. sooo burdensome that a judge has a temporary injunction in place against the prevision).

    Cambria and Walters missed a golden opportunity to do our industry a great service by educating a segment of the lay public about the challenges our industry faces to protect our nation's right to freedom of speech. Instead, they chose to daemonize a member of our industry that was obviously being targeted (and being targeted probably for being gay). All because they wanted some free publicity for themselves.

    Disgusting.


  4. #4
    Rimmates.com
    Guest
    Comparison:

    If you are driving a car and you get caught speeding, you get a ticket, maybe go to court, and pay a fine. Done.

    If you are driving a car and you get caught speeding without ever having obtained a license or car insurance, you are clearly in violation of lots of state laws and you will be fined, reprimanded, and possibly even jailed.

    There is no mention if Coastguys actually failed to comply with the law for keeping records of names and ages of their models. It sounds like people want to jump on the company with an "Ah-ha!" and prosecute and run them out of business. The fact that a PO box was used instead of a real address is indeed wrong and should not go unpunished. But too many people want to see EVERYONE in the porn industry cracked down and put out of business for any small violation.

    This guy probably has perfect records of his models, but just didn't want to use his home address as a reference. That should be noted and corrected. Hell, I think even a warning without a fine should be in order.


  5. #5
    LiveTwinksCam.com LiveTwinksCam's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2005
    Location
    Tampa, FL
    Posts
    869
    I couldn't agree more, I don't even watch the local news here in Tampa or read the local newspapers, they would report about a cat in the tree. I remember when I first moved here they were literally reporting about a cat in the tree.

    The guy got caught running a gay porn site and resigned, so Tampa did further investigating and dug up the 2257 crap.

    Such small town news, but thought I would share it with yall.
    Thanks,
    Jacob

    Add HOT Live Feeds to your site!
    www.LiveTwinksCam.com/webmasters.html


  6. #6
    Rimmates.com
    Guest
    Hey DonMike, if you are reading this... I just happened to click on a video from Maxpixels, and the custodian of records address is listed as a PO Box.

    PM or email me and I will give you the info. Maybe you should contact the producer.


  7. #7
    desslock
    Guest
    Well, Tampa is also in Florida. Sounds to me like someone else there is trying to make some controverisal news combining the saucy ingredients of gays and teens and sex...... it worked with Mark Foley there.

    Steve


  8. #8
    On the other hand.... You have different fingers
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    3,548
    Quote Originally Posted by Rimmates.com View Post
    Comparison:
    The fact that a PO box was used instead of a real address is indeed wrong and should not go unpunished. But too many people want to see EVERYONE in the porn industry cracked down and put out of business for any small violation.

    This guy probably has perfect records of his models, but just didn't want to use his home address as a reference. That should be noted and corrected. Hell, I think even a warning without a fine should be in order.
    Nice idea, but that's not what 2257 says, so it would be up to a judge (or whatever deal is hammered out with a prosecutor) as to what the punishment would be.

    Of course if you have a ton of money as the dude from Girls Gone Wild does, you can shoot underage models to your heart's content, keep no records at all, and when you get caught, just go "Oh! Sorry! I'll stop selling them now" and pay a fine and go on doing business as usual.


  9. #9
    Rimmates.com
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by gaybucks_chip View Post
    Of course if you have a ton of money as the dude from Girls Gone Wild does, you can shoot underage models to your heart's content, keep no records at all, and when you get caught, just go "Oh! Sorry! I'll stop selling them now" and pay a fine and go on doing business as usual.
    I wasn't using the Girls Gone Wild example because he obviously couldn't do business as usual if he had no records to begin with. I just don't think a business should be shut down and closed simply because proper records were listed at an improper address. The GGW thing obviously extends far beyond that.

    Hey, where is the best place to read a full legal (i.e. hard to read and understand legal wording crap) online copy of the Title 18 USC 2257 document?


  10. #10
    dbndc
    Guest
    Go to freespeechcoalition.com and look under 2257. They have prepared a copy of the new 2257 as amended by the Adam Walsh Act.


  11. #11
    On the other hand.... You have different fingers
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    3,548
    Quote Originally Posted by Rimmates.com View Post
    I just don't think a business should be shut down and closed simply because proper records were listed at an improper address.
    Well, I agree with you... but my point was that what we *think* and what the law says are two different things. 2257 is pretty clear on the rules and penalties.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •