Google Going 'Porn Free'

[Lee]

MEDIA ADVISORY, April 25 /Standard Newswire/ -- Kinderstart.com, the little search engine for parents of children zero to seven, filed an appeal to the 9th Circuit Friday, April 13th and will continue its legal battle against GOOGLE in federal court.

KinderStart demands Google remove all Pornography from its index!

GOOGLE injected pornography into the case by declaring in open court that KINDERSTART was "rife with porn," and declared this was the reason for the ban of KINDERSTART.

According to Dr. Victor Goodman, KINDERSTART'S Spokesman, just the opposite is true.

"KINDERSTART, since 2000, has provided a safe haven for parents and children from the Pornography that infests the INTERNET and specifically the GOOGLE Index."

This outlandish lie by GOOGLE demonstrates just how far GOOGLE will go to amass profits and control over the INTERNET.

Goodman continues, "GOOGLE may well be the largest repository of Pornographic Information and Sites in the History of Man."

Further, according to Goodman "GOOGLE profits in the untold millions of dollars annually by selling ads which lead to Pornographic Websites - Thus GOOGLE makes huge income from Pornography of all sorts. GOOGLE is in the Porn business big time and on an annual basis may generate more money from links and ads to and for Pornography than any other company."

Goodman continues," KINDERSTART has never run a Pornographic ad, has never derived a Penny from that trade and never will."

Additionally says Goodman, "there are no Pornographic links on KINDERSTART, and if it is ever spammed with Un-seemly Content it is removed the minute that we become aware of it."

KINDERSTART appeals to the parents and children of the World to Demand that GOOGLE - remove all sites that link to Pornography or place a Warning stating that, "GOOGLE promotes Pornography on its search engine", and further listing all of those sites with a statement that "this site is rife with porn and is not appropriate for children and or young adults."

GOOGLE amazingly rewards many Porn sites with high page ranks and claims that a higher page rank = important high quality websites. (See http://www.google.com/technology/)

Dr. Goodman appeals to all Organizations both Religious and Secular.

"Please help us fight GOOGLE in the Courts and in the Court of Public Opinion, so that we may stop GOOGLES public display of Pornographic Links, Ads and Images to our Children and Young Adults. We need dollars to fight this "evil empire" that sees no wrong in corrupting our youth...it must be stopped! We are leading the fight, but need your financial, vocal, moral and physical support. Please join by contacting us above and help protect our children our country and our future."

http://www.standardnewswire.com/news/98014986.html

I highly doubt their request is going to be acted on, at least how the group wants it to be but, it does raise an interesting hypothesis, what happens if, due to pressure from the Federal Government Google has to end up removing listings for porn sites from its engine? It has already happened in several other countries, where the governments didnt like some of the material being displayed on Googles localized SERPs and they were forced to remove it.

So, what if Google ends up having to go 'porn free'?

Regards,

Lee

[DEVELISH]

they can't... please, no... I just finished scripting some automatic keyword extractor / site generator which I intend to deploy on numerous domains :-(

BUT... IMHO surfers will use different SEs to find porn related sites


:develish:

[Jasun]

So who decides what's pornographic?

[deanb]

they can't... please, no... I just finished scripting some automatic keyword extractor / site generator which I intend to deploy on numerous domains :-(

BUT... IMHO surfers will use different SEs to find porn related sites


:develish:

I would have to agree here. I think that people who are looking for porn, will just go to some place else to find it.

[Dzinerbear]

http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/20...-over-pagerank

Don't worry about it. Kinderstart has been suing Google for years and continually loses. They sued Google because their site was dropped from
the search engine's index. The case went nowhere.

You want to see a whole list of whacked things this company has sued over click here:

http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...&q=kinderstart

And furthermore, forcing Google to remove pornographic listings would be contrary to your First Amendment, I believe.

Michael

[DEVELISH]

I can imagine that you can tell by the words on a website what topic the given page is most likely to be about.

But pornography in one country is not pornography in another one.
For example: hardcore in germany starts with a hole (be it pussy or butt), stiff dick (>45° angle) or visible cum.

[IdolKnights]

I see filtering options being a possibility in the future.

Where a common “Men” keyword will bring up sites from adult to medical to evolution, a future filtering option Google “Could” take on is the need for an adult or porn wildcard: “*Adult* men” or “Adult:men”

But for this to work, a total re-indexing and mandatory site labeling system would need to come about.

[Lee]

And furthermore, forcing Google to remove pornographic listings would be contrary to your First Amendment, I believe.

Actually, it wouldnt be.

They could simply 'choose' not to list porn sites on their engine and there is nothing anyone could do about it.

Regards,

Lee

[Dzinerbear]

Certainly they could choose to, but forcing them to do so would be infringing on their right to display them if they wanted to.

Michael

[Lee]

Certainly they could choose to, but forcing them to do so would be infringing on their right to display them if they wanted to.

True but right now nobody is forcing them to disallow adult websites displaying AdSense ads, but they 'chose' to go that route.

I just think this is more of a possibility than a lot of people realize.

Regards,

Lee

[Squirt]

The adult filter is automatically on when you first access Google if I remember correctly.

It's odd where these people come from and the fact such loons are considered credible in mainstream is distressing.