This thread about hypnotizing guys on cam..
http://forums.gaywidewebmasters.com/...ad.php?t=23506
Got me thinking about how surfers perceive the stuff they see happen on porn sites and in movies they buy, if adult webmasters cant distinguish between 'reality' and a 'script' do you think surfers are able to tell the difference?
Specifically with sites like we have talked about before, pseduo rape sites, sleeping guy sites (sorry Squirt ) and those sites that show guys/girls being 'exposed' in public without their consent.
If this type of content, even though it is consensual on camera between the models appearing in it, even though there are disclaimers saying it is all consensual etc, is often confused as being non-consensual by webmasters, do you think surfers are going to think the same way and beleive these types of sites are 'real' in the actions they are portraying?
In your opinion, are there certain legal niches that we perhaps shouldnt be promoting or producing because they blur the lines between what is 'real' and what is 'fiction' when it comes to porn and could this blurred line cause viewers of such content to go out and break the law?
Your thoughts on this?
Again, sorry to Squirt for mentioning his site i know he gets a lot of grief about it from certain people but it kind of fit to the topic so i had to mention it.
Regards,
Lee
Bookmarks