To get these new proposals for 2257 dismissed?

Especially this part...

Records are not required to be maintained by either a primary
producer or by a secondary producer for a visual depiction of sexually
explicit conduct that consists only of lascivious exhibition of the genitals or
pubic area of a person, and contains no other sexually explicit
conduct, whose original production date was prior to July 27, 2006.
It would seem to me that right now, these new proposals are only 'bad' for people using new, exclusive, custom content or content created after July 27th 2006.

Your thoughts, do you think the FSC trying to 'defend the industry' could end up hurting us if they try to get these new proposals removed?

Regards,

Lee