So a couple of weeks ago i tried a little experiment in terms of getting some site reviews done.

The experiment was this, i took two of the Condom Cash sites and redid them from scratch, both sites had EXACTLY the same content inside them, both sites had EXACTLY the same upsells inside them and both sites had EXACTLY the same cost and EXACTLY the same type of HTML based tour.

After a couple of days i got contacted about 1 of the sites and it was going to be reviewed, no problem there, on a scale of 1 to 5 the first site scored a 4.

A couple of days later, the next site had been reviewed, and scored a 1.

Why was there such a difference in the review score if both sites had exactly the same stuff in them? Your guess is as good as mine :eek:

Both reviews were written by the same person too LOL

Regards,

Lee