Results 1 to 10 of 10

Thread: If Picture Content Is Damn Near Worthless Now...

  1. #1
    You do realize by 'gay' I mean a man who has sex with other men?
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    New Orleans, Louisiana.
    Posts
    21,635

    If Picture Content Is Damn Near Worthless Now...

    When are we going to start seeing paysites with nothing but movie and flash animations on their tours and banners?

    Regards,

    Lee


  2. #2
    Gay is the new Black
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    1,561
    Loaded question!

    You are holding a still image against two concepts. One being your membership content and the other being your layout design that showcases your member's area.

    I think, as a whole, there will always be a need/use for still images in a design. (not that they are required as I have seen some text based tours)

    And in a members area, The MASS of your traffic may be looking for Video only but it's not to say, All surfers are looking for just video.

    I still go to a gallery before a theater when inside a paysite. And with the estimated numbers of people online... I know I'm not the only one.


  3. #3
    chick with a bass basschick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    7,922
    even if you accept picture content as worthless - and i don't, although in many sites i consider it the lower value content - tours will still use vidcaps as samples. it's an easy way to get more info about each movie across so that the vidcaps supplement the trailers and more of the action or scenario can be shown.


  4. #4
    You do realize by 'gay' I mean a man who has sex with other men?
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    New Orleans, Louisiana.
    Posts
    21,635
    Quote Originally Posted by basschick View Post
    tours will still use vidcaps as samples. it's an easy way to get more info about each movie across so that the vidcaps supplement the trailers and more of the action or scenario can be shown.
    But by creating vidcaps of movies, you are making... Picture content.

    Regards,

    Lee


  5. #5
    "That which submits is not always weak" Kushiel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Location
    Charlotte, North Carolina
    Posts
    281
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee View Post
    But by creating vidcaps of movies, you are making... Picture content.

    Regards,

    Lee
    I think see where BassChick is coming from though... There's a (marginal) difference between a photo shoot's content unrelated to the video content, and screen captures that show a preview of what's to come in movies inside the site.
    "All things in moderation... even moderation itself.." B.F.


  6. #6
    chick with a bass basschick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    7,922
    i wouldn't bother to make a tour with no picture content. without photos, there's nothing to show guys when they first get to the tour. photos show more and cost less to use.

    Quote Originally Posted by Lee View Post
    But by creating vidcaps of movies, you are making... Picture content.

    Regards,

    Lee


  7. #7
    Xstr8guy
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Lee View Post
    If Picture Content Is Damn Near Worthless Now...
    Who says photo content is worthless?!


  8. #8
    The Prince of Dorkness Jasun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    West Hollywood
    Posts
    2,283
    we have members who tell us they join JUST for our still pics and dont' care about the video.

    Go figure.
    Jasun Mark. Crass of the Titans.


  9. #9
    I've always been openly gay. It would never occur to me to behave otherwise.
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Posts
    507
    Jasun: Ditto.


  10. #10
    Baghdad Bob
    Guest
    lots of posters on gfy arent using pics any more because they said they dont covnert well enough compared to movies


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •