First reply wins! I sign up for UGAS lifetime instantly on your site!

[leatherboy]

I will purchase a ugas lifetime membership instantly. Give me your site address and I will sign up, you can earn the commission. no fake, no joke. First reply wins. :sunny:

[leatherboy]

This is no joke!!
I need just a ugas membership and will sign-up for this. I am not a ugas webmaster and therefore I will purchase them. No ugas webmaster there who wants the commission?

[basschick]

http://www.barefoottwinks.com/index2.htm

be interesting to hear what ugas is like for a member.

[leatherboy]

Congratulation!

I have signed up in this moment for a lifetime membership via your site.

Thank you for your Order!
Your password is xxx

You may now use your password to access any UGAS site

until it expires on December 31, 1969


This information has also been sent to you via e-mail at
xxx

Use your password at any of our regular

UGAS Participating Sites


Why 1969??

[IdolKnights]

The barefoot Twink site is funny ...

The 2257 reads "This site contains no nude or sexually explicit images or videos of any kind."

However on the tour you see "Mike - 19 Years Old" with his pants pulled off his ass

[basschick]

actually that's the nudest image in the site. the site doesn't show cock, balls, asshole or anything - just feet and mike's buttcrack.

The barefoot Twink site is funny ...

The 2257 reads "This site contains no nude or sexually explicit images or videos of any kind."

However on the tour you see "Mike - 19 Years Old" with his pants pulled off his ass

[abostonboy]

This site does not need 2257.

[gaybucks_chip]

I think a lot of webmasters (including us) put up a 2257 exemption notice if there's content that's even slightly questionable. Our boysfeetclub.com site has no explicit content and almost no nudity so it's clearly exempt, but we maintain 2257 notices nonetheless.

Much better to overcomply and be safe than to misjudge and try to argue with the justice department about why your site doesn't need labeling.

[abostonboy]

I think a lot of webmasters (including us) put up a 2257 exemption notice if there's content that's even slightly questionable. Our boysfeetclub.com site has no explicit content and almost no nudity so it's clearly exempt, but we maintain 2257 notices nonetheless.

Much better to overcomply and be safe than to misjudge and try to argue with the justice department about why your site doesn't need labeling.

I agree. I was just saying that what is on the site is not sexually explicit. A buttcrack does not trigger 2257 from what i am told.