New To The Board. Need Your Feedback.

[PR_Don]

Hi Everyone. I'm Don, the PIMPROLL marketing guy.

Just want to get a feel for how these 3 NEW EXCLUSIVE SITES will be received by the gay webmaster community.

CumSwapGuys.com, CreampieGuys.com and BarebackBeginners.com

(Sorry I couldn't make them linkable, I just joined this forum today!)

All of these sites launch today and are presented in High Definition.

We're even upping our PPS payouts in support of this "triple-crown" release because we're feeling confident about their prospects.

Would love to hear what you think of the tours.

[BananaMan]

I find the line "Just say no to condoms" to be repulsive. You seem to be advocating that all gay men should engage in unsafe sex.

[GPallan]

looks like the same bunch of guys fucking on all the vids...so maybe they were all tested and it was all done safe??

and the comment doesn’t bother me. it's bare backing fucking...you can’t sugar coat it

I find the line "Just say no to condoms" to be repulsive. You seem to be advocating that all gay men should engage in unsafe sex.

[gaybucks_chip]

I agree with Trevor.

It's one thing to say that consenting adults have a right to bareback.

It's quite another to have a site called "bareback *beginners* and to actively advocate an irresponsible, unsafe act.

Perhaps someone should start "Crystal Meth Beginners" and advertise it with "Don't listen to those pussies who tell you it's addictive! It's fun!"

[Alex_Manifest_M]

I am not an affiliate but rather another sponsor. I think the video formats you are offering are terrific and very forward thinking. The tour seems poised to sell. I could be wrong, but the presentation is pretty advanced for the content that is offered. I'm not sure how many folks want to see cum oozing out of an ass in HD. It is funny though, the clearest and brightest video trailer I ever saw for an adult site had the nastiest content I had ever seen.

You will get alot of different opinions regarding the ethicality(?) of the bareback beginers concept. Both sides will pretty vocal in their thoughts.

[Squirt]

On the upside I think your tour is great, well laid out and oozing of quality.

On the downside you have the same models multiple times on multiple sites. You are also a straight company pimpin a Gay bareback porn site. Bareback porn is contraversial in the Gay community alone, not to mention a straight owned site pimpin it.

Personally I think you guys are off to a great start minus the downside and same setting with multiple couch covers hiding the same couch in all the shoots :groovy:

With a few tweaks you'd do better, the rest not to be listed here. Email me at help at squirtit dit cum if you want some guidance (mis spellings in email addy created for obvious reasons

[PR_Don]

some poignant comments here. agree that we need more scene diversification and more models. as for the "bareback" thing, let's not forget that porn still has a fantasy element...and I think most guys (gay or not) fantasize about fucking sans rubber. problem is, it ain't a perfect world. in porn films, however, the world can appear to be anything you dream up.

[Chilihost]

welcome to GWW.

just a quick note, we are not GFY so there is no need to post spammy intros in big bold fonts.

[Andrew]

wow that's quite an impression to make.. right off the bat!

[Dzinerbear]

looks like the same bunch of guys fucking on all the vids...so maybe they were all tested and it was all done safe??

No, I think Pimproll, along with Rainbow Revenue and a couple of other sites, all bought their content from the same place, which obviously uses the same models over and over again. And that'll be the biggest downside of these sites. A lot of the bareback sites run by straight companies have pretty similar names and they're using a lot of the same models, so the surfers aren't likely to remember which one is which.

I did look at them the other day and they seemed fine, but I do remember saying, "Oh, it's all the same guys."

Michael

[basschick]

you asked for feedback, and that's what you got. it appears that you didn't really want feedback since your response is this reply. that being the case, perhaps next time you should just make an announcement.

btw, i am probably a little less anti bareback than some of the people in this thread, and wasn't originally going to comment on it at all, but your response felt rather callous to me. porn is only a complete fantasy if you have a toon site. as it is, real live people are used to make the content - real people who could get hep C or HIV and die slowly, expensively and painfully by degrees.

perhaps - since you asked for feedback - it would have been more useful to find out just how negative webmasters' feelings were about the content, to find out whether the models were tested before the shoots and if the director made full disclosures regarding the risks of bareback before the shoots or to at least address people's very legit concerns here.

some poignant comments here. agree that we need more scene diversification and more models. as for the "bareback" thing, let's not forget that porn still has a fantasy element...and I think most guys (gay or not) fantasize about fucking sans rubber. problem is, it ain't a perfect world. in porn films, however, the world can appear to be anything you dream up.

[SPACE GLIDER]

Wonder what porn would be like with modern technology and not so modern STDs