Am I reading this right?
"In a separate case a British producer, Rufus Ffoulkes, was jailed last week on a child pornography charge for putting a 16-year-old boy in a gay porn film in which he had unprotected sex.
The US company which released the film had refused appeals to stop selling the DVD until it was approached by Newsnight.
"
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/programme...ht/7277000.stm
Can someone PLEASE tell me the US company that released the film?
Lloyd - Stunner Media - ICQ: 216150073
"The key to success is to risk thinking unconventional thoughts. Convention is the enemy of progress. If you go down just one corridor of thought you never get to see what’s in the rooms leading off it." - Trevor Baylis
Lloyd its Puppy Productions - the dvd is called "Royal Raw Auditions"
Have a read of:
http://dewayneinsd.blogspot.com/2008...-underage.html
what idiots
where's the justice department
Seriously! I thought I read that wrong at first. I was under the impression this was for his personal pleasure and was not released to the public.Originally Posted by jIgG
Thanks Mickey.
Lloyd - Stunner Media - ICQ: 216150073
"The key to success is to risk thinking unconventional thoughts. Convention is the enemy of progress. If you go down just one corridor of thought you never get to see what’s in the rooms leading off it." - Trevor Baylis
Does anyone else find it amusing they are talking about underage kids in porn and right at the bottom of the page is a HUGE selection of Brent Corrigan photos? LOL
Regards,
Lee
just noticed that. yeah. it is strange.
Lloyd - Stunner Media - ICQ: 216150073
"The key to success is to risk thinking unconventional thoughts. Convention is the enemy of progress. If you go down just one corridor of thought you never get to see what’s in the rooms leading off it." - Trevor Baylis
Did you see this quote?
"Unprotected sex is standard in the gay porn industry."
WTF??? I would hardly stay "standard".
Don Mike
DonMikeCali@gmail.com
I've heard that a number of times.
I think it's a rationalization the bareback producers use to justify their decisions.
Interesting, though, that icreme just announced they are dropping all bareback production and will in the future only shoot condom content.
I've also noticed several other (smaller) producers that had been mostly bareback that have recently either stopped producing bareback entirely or started producing safer content again in addition to bareback.
The other thing is, models seem to be becoming more savvy about the issue. Several prominent twink models that had previously done bareback have publicly come out publicly against it and have said that now they've been fully educated on the risks, they will no longer bareback and are advising their friends and other models against it also.
Well, I think consenting adults have a right to make an informed decision for what they do in their own bedroom. However, I think there should be more education on the dangers of barebacking. I have a friend who barebacks, but only as a top because he doesn't believe he can get HIV that way. That tears me up inside because he's obviously not aware of exactly how dangerous it really is.
And the idea that this scumbag producer talked an impressionable 16 year old into endangering his health in this way is disgusting and he should be put away for life. And what really burns my ass is that the media, as usual, makes this situation representative of the whole gay adult industry.
Don Mike
DonMikeCali@gmail.com
yeah Lee everyone knows Brent Corrigan is a friend we are neighbors and I help them out! I don't exactly hide this fact look at the front page of my blog! AND SEE BELOW
I had to check this thread out everyone has been "visiting" from GWW today.
I want to add something I am getting some scuttlebut (nothing confirmed yet) that the UK Authority's are contacting ALL the models they can find from any Rufus Foulkes videos and that of his partners. To check age docs.
I have been contacted by two people who seem very knowledgeable about his operations who also state his HIV test checks were "criminally negligent or simply nonexistent despite his public statements.
FYI about Brent Corrigan
Yes we all know Brent was underage and a "Junior" in HS when he first filmed for Cobra.
Still does not excuse Brent's fake ID right? Nope and he has admitted as much, but what about Bryan when he was told in June 2004 he had an "underage problem" he told Brent and his BF to shut up and get me an ID any ID that shows your 18!
That is Criminal Conspiracy AFTER the Fact!
Bryan KNEW how old "Brent Corrigan" was so its not like the Boy tricked the Producer. Bryan was an Ehebophille! We have sworn statements from 6 boys that Bryan knew the true age's of his "underage boys" and could have cared less. All turned over to DOJ for NonAction as usual!
FYI I turned Bryan into the FBI in 2003 in the case of a San Diego boy I knew was 17
No response,
Rest easy guys DOJ does not PROSECUTE, use all the 16 and 17 year old boys you want just stay away from 15 year olds!
Not to get into a pissing contest, but that simply isn't true.
The Innocent Images division of the FBI, charged with investigating underage porn issues, is overloaded and prioritizes cases. They do not start an investigation simply because some random guy makes a complaint, even if the random guy is a model. They also do not act quickly, and even when they do act, they are not public about it until the investigation is concluded.
Bryan was either being investigated by innocent images, or about to be at the time of his death. This information came directly from innocent images.
Also, it's interesting the story that Brent is telling now, because it's a completely different one than he was telling a couple of years ago. But that shouldn't be much of a surprise.
The "story" has never changed it is just being more widely reported because Bryan is no longer around to threaten to "rearrange that crooked smile and fullfill all your prison rape fantasy's"
I have been involved with Bryan Kocis since 2001 and I did in fact report him to the FBI and watched as absolutely nothing was done about this man,
I am simply tired of people who say DOJ acts THEY DO NOT!
YOU are correct about priority's which is why I made a public statement on my Blog months ago
Boys age 16 and 17 may be filmed with impunity in the US DOJ has to date NEVER PROSECUTED a case.
Jeff Browning 1990's ????
And Brent Corrigans underage video was withdrawn by distributors not by any action by the FBI in fact you can still buy all 4 titles overseas. They were never flagged by DOJ as Child Porn and will not be
Priority's again.
The story changed completely from the one Sean told me in the summer of 2005, as he was deciding to tell Bryan.
Tell that to the 23 people who were arrested yesterday in an international child porn bust based in the US.I have been involved with Bryan Kocis since 2001 and I did in fact report him to the FBI and watched as absolutely nothing was done about this man,
I am simply tired of people who say DOJ acts THEY DO NOT!
As far as I know, the DOJ is not in the business of flagging *any* titles as CP.And Brent Corrigans underage video was withdrawn by distributors not by any action by the FBI in fact you can still buy all 4 titles overseas. They were never flagged by DOJ as Child Porn and will not be
Wrong Bryan was informed in April 2004! that he had an underage problem when he was approached by Chris Henriquez's ex BF Jonathan Deverell. This is who broke the news to Bryan about Seans true age. In June of 2004 Bryan confronted Sean about the ID and his Age.
Any other statement (even by Sean in 2005)was cover for Bryan, indeed the early settlement negotiated in December 2006 had a provision where Sean was to categorically state
"I lied and Bryan was not aware of my true age in June 2004" Sean refused to sign such a statement and it was amended by Aty Sean Macias to read "I Bryan Kocis was not aware of Sean Lockharts true age June 2004"
Looks like semantics till you realize Bryan Kocis required exoneration and Legal cover for the filming in June of 2004 and his subsequent sexual relationship with a boy he KNEW to be underage! Why do you think I was so vehemently opposed to ANY accommodation or settlement with Bryan Kocis in December 2006?
That settlement would have taken Sean OUT as a witness in any Federal case against Bryan.
Chip why would you have had any conversations with Sean of any substantive nature in 2005? Sean was exclusive to Cobra he could not work with you and Grant Roy was in the picture during that time. Regardless Sean did not reveal ALL about the age issue in 2005 because of the legal & personal threats Bryan was making at that time.
I criticized both Grant and Sean for not playing hardball and having Bryan arrested for Statutory Rape (indefensible under California law its a strict age issue) I was told this was not done to protect Brent Everett and Chase Mackenzie who would be chargeable as well.
My response was "Too bad so Sad" Bryan needs to be targeted and arrested.
Too many people in this business KNEW about Bryan and his Ehebophilla and did NOTHING and still defend him to this day!
You are being deliberately facetious you know full well the arrests yesterday involved young children (as young as 2) in violent rape and sexual abuse.I have been involved with Bryan Kocis since 2001 and I did in fact report him to the FBI and watched as absolutely nothing was done about this man,
I am simply tired of people who say DOJ acts THEY DO NOT!
you said,,,
Tell that to the 23 people who were arrested yesterday in an international child porn bust based in the US.
Grant Roys attorney Zeke Cortez researched the subject (male underage teens)and stated flatly to me in his office in August 2006 that not one prosecution has been recorded by DOJ since 1991 involving the filming of 16 or 17 male models.
Not one!
So what we have as of today,,
One prosecution in the UK on One count of using a 16 year old male model in Gay Porn. One Rufus Ffoulkes
Name an American case.
Where is a name in the US?
Who has been charged?
In ANY instance of 16 and 17 year old males in Gay Porn!
There are no names because NO ONE Not Bryan Kocis NO ONE has ever been arrested ,charged or convicted in such a case!
Believe what you want, I would not have expected anything other than apologia on anything to do with Brent/Sean.
What I heard in the conversations was far from defense/cover for Bryan. And as for the nature of the conversations, why would it matter to you? They weren't about Sean working for us; in fact, that issue was never even raised.
For the record, I'm not claiming that Bryan did not have reason to suspect Sean was underage; he had reports even before the first videos were released, that was clear in the initial conversations. What's different is the nature of exactly when Bryan knew for sure that Sean was underage at the time of the filming of the initial scenes, and who was primarily responsible.
The conversations -- and there were a number of them -- between Sean and I took place before Sean got set up with Chad, and there are emails back and forth that document everything (and unlike those of some of the bloggers, mine are complete with headers, IP addresses, supporting documents, etc.)
Like I said, I don't wish to argue. I would be about the last person to defend Bryan, as I agree that his behaviors, as documented by many, were deplorable. I just dislike revisionist history, particularly when Bryan isn't around to document his side of things, and when the other side keeps trying to revise things further and further to make Sean look more and more blameless.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
Bookmarks