Results 1 to 3 of 3

Thread: Is your Email full of Spam or Ham?

  1. #1
    Moderator Bec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,419

    Is your Email full of Spam or Ham?

    The percentage of spam vs ham mail could very much depend on what letter of the alphabet your email name starts with.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/08...ance_research/

    The use by spammers of dictionary attacks means those whose email address begins with a less common first character are liable to get less spam.

    Research by Richard Clayton of Cambridge University was initially reported as establishing that usernames beginning with A are likely to get more spam than those sporting a Z.

    Those with email addresses starting with A - "aardvarks" - got 35 per cent spam, but "zebras" received a mere 20 per cent.

    That's true, but it's only part of a bigger picture, Clayton clarified on Friday.

    "The point being that the effect I am describing has little to do with Z being at the end of the alphabet, and A at the front, but seems to be connected to the relative rarity of zebras," Clayton explained.

    M and P are popular first letters for people’s names. Each get around 42 per cent spam, more than those whose usernames begin with A.

    Clayton based his analysis on email traffic logs maintained by Demon Internet. The ISP filters automatically filters out some spam based on its origin, so the percentage of spam to real email (ham) received by Demon users is better than commonly quoted figures that four in five email messages or more circulating on the net are junk mail.

    The study revealed a disparity between the proportions of spam received by active addresses with different first characters.

    The actual volume of spam a user receives will depend on factors such as whether they have been careful not to post their email address online or to avoid responding to dodgy offers. Clayton's research shows that even averaging out different behaviours, something as simple as the first character in an email address can have a big effect on the junk mail volumes a user receives.

    "The most likely reason for these results is the prevalence of 'dictionary' or 'Rumpelstiltskin' attacks (where spammers guess addresses). If there are not many other zebras, then guessing zebra names is less likely," Clayton explained.

    "Aardvarks should consider changing species — or asking their favourite email filter designer to think about how this unexpected empirical result can be leveraged into blocking more of their unwanted email," he added.


  2. #2
    chick with a bass basschick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    7,922
    i get less than 1% ham - i suspect that usernames like webmistress, webmaster, reviews, admin tend to get a lot more spam vs ham.


  3. #3
    I'm a farmhand on your dad's rooster ranch. haganxy's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2004
    Location
    Seattle, WA
    Posts
    379
    i get about 3% spam and 97% ham (turkey-ham, i'm jewish so real ham is a "no-no")

    it's due mainly to my daily aggressive approach to training our spam filter to recognize new spam messages
    hagan - IT nerd
    PrideBucks.com
    ICQ: 49962103


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •