Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: UK Porn Ban: A la News of the Weird

  1. #1
    Dusty
    Guest

    UK Porn Ban: A la News of the Weird

    I have been a bit behind on my News of the Weird info, but I saw this on another site quoting my favorite journalist, Chuck Shepard:

    In London, England models wearing chains, stockings and gags have been led around Westminster in protest at laws to make owning “extreme pornography” illegal.
    From next year, possession of images such as those showing a threat to life or serious injury to a person’s genitals will be banned.
    Demonstrators opposite Parliament described this as the government interfering with people’s sex lives.
    Ministers argue the law is needed to cope with more use of internet images.
    The demonstration, organized by the Consenting Adult Action Network, was led by photographer Ben Westwood, son of fashion designer Dame Vivienne Westwood.
    He paraded two “slaves” - models called Jade and Dolly Blowup - across the road from Westminster underground station and around Parliament Square, with police having to hold up the traffic.
    A group of about 20 marchers carried placards with messages including “No to thought crime”, “Penalize crime, not sex” and “Depiction harms no-one”.
    Mr. Westwood said to the BBC: “Why is the government doing this? I think they are just mucking about.
    “They want to seem as though they are doing something to help society, that they must seem strong on law and order.
    “Coming from a government that lied about going into war in Iraq, that seems strange.
    “There are more important issues to be debated than this.”
    ‘Worrying’
    Tourists, drivers and workers in suits looked bemused as the models were led around Parliament Square, passing by statues of Nelson Mandela and several past British prime ministers.
    Mr. Westwood said: “I think that people might be worrying that what they have got in their video collection might be breaking the law. People are going to get a bit nervous.
    “I hope our demonstration does change some minds.”
    The Criminal Justice Act, which was passed earlier this year, shifts criminal responsibility from the producers “of violent and extreme pornography” to consumers.
    This, the government says, is necessary to deal with material obtained via the internet from websites based abroad.
    ‘Unfair’
    The maximum sentence for possession will be three years in prison.
    Campaigners say the new law risks criminalizing thousands of people who use violent pornographic images as part of consensual sexual relationships.
    Bruce Argue, of the group Esinem, said: “We want to draw attention to what is an unfair and ill-thought-out law.”
    The Ministry of Justice spokeswoman says: “Pornographic material which depicts that is likely to result in serious injury to the anus, breasts or genitals has no place in a modern society and should not be tolerated.”
    The act comes into force on 1 January.

    http://newspirates.com/?p=1626

    originally found on: www.newsoftheweird.com


  2. #2
    The Prince of Dorkness Jasun's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jan 2005
    Location
    West Hollywood
    Posts
    2,283
    Now why would anyone want to do "serious injury" to all those beautiful British uncut dicks?
    Jasun Mark. Crass of the Titans.


  3. #3
    Any decent man you ever get is gonna find out you're half dyke and RUN.
    Join Date
    Oct 2008
    Location
    UK
    Posts
    36
    The Ministry of Justice spokeswoman says: “Pornographic material which depicts that is likely to result in serious injury to the anus, breasts or genitals has no place in a modern society and should not be tolerated.”
    Really it should be a case of if you don't like it don't watch it and left at that...

    I mean nobody is forcing people to watch the content, and to find it you would have to be looking for something along those lines anyway to an extent, Its not as generic as typing "pussy cat pictures" into a SE when you really do want to see our furry friends and not a bunch of scantly clad women.

    Were all as good is in jail anyway in the UK, I mean you cant say or do anything much anymore, unless your in the so called ethnic minority.

    That's way I see it anyway.


  4. #4
    You do realize by 'gay' I mean a man who has sex with other men?
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    New Orleans, Louisiana.
    Posts
    21,635
    Quote Originally Posted by Andyr View Post
    Really it should be a case of if you don't like it don't watch it and left at that...
    Unfortunately it really isnt that simple, there are a LOT of webmasters that still (even thought it is illegal to do so) use domains that would attract children and display hardcore porn on the index pages, not to mention webmasters that use keywords on their totally adult sites that children would search for, for example, Pokemon, most 'toon' sites i have seen that are free sites or TGPs have this keyword on them.

    Regards,

    Lee


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •