Vintage Porn

[dajdomains]

I only tend to like vintage porn. William Higgins and Jean Daniel Cadinot's early works are some of the best I've seen. There's just something about vintage porn that's missing from the porn of today IMO. Anyone else prefer the vintage stuff?

[Lee]

Lots of gay surfers love vintage porn, http://www.retromale.com has been in our top 7 converting sites since 2 weeks after its launch, http://www.gayretroporn.com has been in the top 10 converting sites for the last 6 months.

Im glad im actually one of the few sponsor programs that has retro gay content because this stuff converts like sex scandals to a republican

Regards,

Lee

[basschick]

i know some folks who are about to launch a classic porn site with guys like jack wrangler. they own the content, so the videos aren't available except their site. it's www.hotgayclassics.com

[LavenderLounge]

I have over 10,000 vintage images on LavenderLounge.com, it's one of the main selling points of my site.

I have also been collecting vintage 8mm gay porn. I am converting them to digital asap. Many of them have never been seen by this generation.

[dajdomains]

Didn't even know of a lot of those sites. Thanks.

[gaybucks_chip]

I have also been collecting vintage 8mm gay porn. I am converting them to digital asap.

Are you not concerned about 2257 issues that indicate that reediting, digitizing, etc may trigger 2257 requirements? Have you cleared this with a good adult attorney? I've been asking around about this and haven't found many people willing to give definitive answers on this issue...

[basschick]

the first three adult attorneys i spoke to on this matter were willing to give their clear opinion on this. every one of them said that in their opinion digitizing the videos makes them a new production - and btw, that included chad.

Are you not concerned about 2257 issues that indicate that reediting, digitizing, etc may trigger 2257 requirements? Have you cleared this with a good adult attorney? I've been asking around about this and haven't found many people willing to give definitive answers on this issue...

[gaybucks_chip]

I've always been inclined to feel that way as well. I *think* that there's some new language in 2257A, but I don't, offhand, remember the specifics... and, of course, nobody's really weighed in yet on the interpretation of the new regs.

[basschick]

the only thing that would affect this, i would think, would be the legal definition regarding this issue of the word "produce". if digitizing older content is to produce, then the regs would apply. if digitizing older content does not mean produce, then the regs wouldn't.

I've always been inclined to feel that way as well. I *think* that there's some new language in 2257A, but I don't, offhand, remember the specifics... and, of course, nobody's really weighed in yet on the interpretation of the new regs.

[LavenderLounge]

The original rules went into effect July 3, 1995. At the time, everything made prior to that date was exempt.

Click the 2257 link on any vintage movie on AEBN and it says "exempt". What do their lawyers say?

[basschick]

everything produced before a certain date was exempt. i gather from one of the lawyers i asked about this that "produced" has been previously defined in court as being digitized.

i know several companies with vintage content with 2257 statements that say they're exempt. when i asked them about it, they didn't bother to check on this because they assumed - not unreasonably - that the content was shot before the date and that was that. maybe aebn talked to a lawyer that has a different take on this issue, but so far, i haven't found a lawyer with a different take on it.

also because of the fsc challenges to the law, fsc members are temporarily exempt from any of the changes to the 2257 regs that have happened on and after june 23, 2005.

The original rules went into effect July 3, 1995. At the time, everything made prior to that date was exempt.

Click the 2257 link on any vintage movie on AEBN and it says "exempt". What do their lawyers say?

[DirtyNick]

Who doesn't like Classic/Vintage? Ahh those were the days

I liked them so much I own ClassicGayPorn.com and do very well with it through Hotmovies/MovieDollars

[abostonboy]

The original rules went into effect July 3, 1995. At the time, everything made prior to that date was exempt.

Click the 2257 link on any vintage movie on AEBN and it says "exempt". What do their lawyers say?

Are the AEBN lawyers retained by you? Unless a lawyer is retained by me, I don't care what they say. The AEBN lawyers are not going to defend you in a court of law.

[Rich]

Vintage porn is hot i have a couple of sites i built the past few weeks that are doing okay selling vintage content i wish there were more sites out there with this type of stuff on them