Results 1 to 8 of 8

Thread: Google Listing ALL Gay Porn Sites As 'Harmful'

  1. #1
    You do realize by 'gay' I mean a man who has sex with other men?
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    New Orleans, Louisiana.
    Posts
    21,635

    WTF? Google Listing ALL Gay Porn Sites As 'Harmful'

    Check it out...

    http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...262&q=gay+porn

    Has the adult industry finally killed Google traffic or is this just some sort of glitch with their system?

    Surely it must be a bug and Google isnt seriously listing all gay porn sites as potentially harmful to surfers?

    Regards,

    Lee


  2. #2
    Gay is the new Black
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    1,561
    yet to find out why, you only get...

    Server Error
    The server encountered a temporary error and could not complete your request.

    Please try again in 30 seconds.
    Or at least, it's all I'm getting at the moment.
    Be Who You Are!


  3. #3
    Jesus was never married, ran around with twelve guys, and was betrayed by a kiss from another guy. 100boys's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jun 2007
    Posts
    305
    I'm getting the normal search results...
    Add up to 10 sites per day to our directory: MyGayLinX Directory
    Trade Hardlinks with our gay TGP's and quality Blogs. - Signup Form -
    Nude Muscle Men Gay Muscle Hunks Gay Fetish Gay Tube Muscle Man Pics Gay Cocks Gay Porn Gay Men


  4. #4
    Life is a dick and when itīs get hard---just fuck it... DEVELISH's Avatar
    Join Date
    Jul 2005
    Posts
    2,367
    all ok here
    :-D


  5. #5
    Gay is the new Black
    Join Date
    Jun 2006
    Location
    Columbia, SC
    Posts
    1,561
    It didn't last long. After I made my post, google was back to normal. Based on the error I received, I too would assume a bug or server issue BUT I would question why it was with adult sites. I didn't check straight listings to see if it affected them as well.
    Be Who You Are!


  6. #6
    You do realize by 'gay' I mean a man who has sex with other men?
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    New Orleans, Louisiana.
    Posts
    21,635
    Quote Originally Posted by IdolKnights View Post
    It didn't last long. After I made my post, google was back to normal. Based on the error I received, I too would assume a bug or server issue BUT I would question why it was with adult sites. I didn't check straight listings to see if it affected them as well.
    Yeah it seemed to get fixed within 15 minutes or so of my initial post, it didnt seem to have effected non-adult sites, although anything 'porn' related was definitely flagged as harmfull, bot gay and straight.

    Regards,

    Lee


  7. #7
    On the other hand.... You have different fingers
    Join Date
    Feb 2004
    Location
    San Francisco
    Posts
    3,548
    According to Google's blog, they had a "human error" that resulted in ALL google search results being flagged as harmful for about 40 minutes. They fixed it in stages, so there was a period where some groups of sites were still showing harmful.

    Nothing intentional, they say, and I'm inclined to believe them.


  8. #8
    You do realize by 'gay' I mean a man who has sex with other men?
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    New Orleans, Louisiana.
    Posts
    21,635
    Looks like its a big news story right now....

    A glitch in a computer security program embedded deeply into Google's search engine briefly prevented users of the popular search engine from visiting any Web sites turned up in search results this morning. Instead, Google users were redirected to page that warned: "This site may harm your computer."


    Calls and e-mails sent to Google were not returned as of publication. I will update this blog if and when I hear back from them about the cause and length of this incident.

    The problem, which appears to have been corrected by the time of publication, was related to Google's "Stop Badware" program, which is designed to keep Internet users from visiting sites that Google's bots have found try to install malicious software when users browse the sites.

    I first learned of the blockage just before 10 a.m. ET, when my wife complained that Google was telling her that OfficeDepot.com was trying to attack our computer.

    When I looked at the search results, I noticed that Google was reporting every single subdomain of OfficeDepot.com was hostile. After about five minutes of poring over the source code for those landing pages, nothing seemed amiss. That is, until I conducted a search for ".gov" and saw that Google was saying all of the sites returned -- even whitehouse.gov and cia.gov -- were malicious. Strangely enough, the Google News results returned in any search did not appear to have the Google-generated malware warning.

    During the time Google's search engine was effectively blocking access to nearly every site in its database, I found that the company's "safe browsing diagnostics" page -- the one that lets a visitor to a blocked page see why Google's automated programs listed the site as harmful -- would not load. My guess is many, many people were trying to visit that site as a result of the glitch, and that the server simply couldn't handle the load.

    Verizon's security folks also appear to have noticed the problem this morning, saying it looks like it lasted about an hour starting at 9:30 a.m. ET.

    Update, 11:46 a.m.: Stopbadware.org, the consortium of industry and academia leaders that handles the database of sites Google lists as harmful, issued the following statement: "This morning, an apparent glitch at Google caused nearly every [update 11:44 am] search listing to carry the "Warning! This site may harm your computer" message. Users who attempted to click through the results saw the "interstitial" warning page that mentions the possibility of badware and refers people to StopBadware.org for more information. This led to a denial of service of our website, as millions of Google users attempted to visit our site for more information. We are working now to bring the site back up. We are also awaiting word from Google about what happened to cause the false warnings."

    Update, 12:38 p.m. ET: Google has posted an update to its official Google blog that attributes this fairly major "oops" to human error: "We periodically receive updates to that list and received one such update to release on the site this morning. Unfortunately (and here's the human error), the URL of '/' was mistakenly checked in as a value to the file and '/' expands to all URLs. Fortunately, our on-call site reliability team found the problem quickly and reverted the file. Since we push these updates in a staggered and rolling fashion, the errors began appearing between 6:27 a.m. and 6:40 a.m. and began disappearing between 7:10 and 7:25 a.m., so the duration of the problem for any particular user was approximately 40 minutes."

    http://voices.washingtonpost.com/sec...?hpid=sec-tech
    I wonder if this 'glitch' could possibly have been a marketing gimmick to get people talking about Google?

    It certainly wouldnt be the first time a company has done something like this to generate media coverage.

    Regards,

    Lee


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •