Results 1 to 5 of 5

Thread: Mature Porn To Be Made Illegal

  1. #1
    You do realize by 'gay' I mean a man who has sex with other men?
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Location
    New Orleans, Louisiana.
    Posts
    21,635

    WTF? Mature Porn To Be Made Illegal

    Pervs preying on the elderly or disabled could soon face harsh new penalties under a first-of-its-kind proposed law that would punish sicko peddlers of geriatric and handicapped porn the same as child pornographers.

    Fueled by a rise in sex abuse against the elderly and disabled and a string of cases involving photography and cyber postings, the proposed legislation would add seniors and the handicapped to kiddie porn laws.

    “Obviously with the technology evolving, the crimes committed using that technology have increased. That’s clearly the case,” said Northwestern District Attorney Elizabeth Scheibel, who covers parts of western Massachusetts and helped craft the proposal. “All we’re trying to do with these two pieces of legislation is to protect our two most vulnerable populations.”

    Emil DeRiggi, spokesman for the state Disabled Persons Protection Commission, said the agency has “certainly seen an increase” in sex abuse cases involving pornography. One case currently being investigated involves a twisted online posting offering sex with a “cognitively impaired” virgin.

    Other recent cases include:

    A pair of caretakers who took their disabled boarder on a “state-to-state party,” taking sexual photos along the way;

    A man with cerebral palsy who can talk only with a communication board was mocked and harassed by caretakers who snapped pictures of his genitals;

    A mentally retarded woman had pornographic pictures taken of her and posted on the Internet by relatives.

    The DPCC reported 44 rapes and 29 indecent assault-and-battery cases in the past three months of 2008. In the past year, the agency reported 92 cases of sexual exploitation.

    Officials said there have been other recent cases involving seniors and the state Executive Office of Elder Affairs is backing the bill.

    “Elder Affairs supports policies that protect vulnerable seniors from exploitation,” spokeswoman Kristina Barry said.

    There are currently no federal laws against elderly or disabled porn, and Massachusetts officials were unaware of any similar legislation in other states. A similar effort, though, is underway in Illinois, where new child porn laws also protect the “severely mentally retarded.”

    Rep. Kathi-Anne Reinstein (D-Revere), who backs the bill, said she’s spoken with senior advocacy groups who report that elder exploitation and pornography is on the rise.

    “We know that it’s happening. I didn’t realize until this whole scenario was brought to my attention that it was an issue,” Reinstein said. “If we can extend protection to the elderly and the disabled, I think it’s kind of a no-brainer.”

    But prominent civil rights attorney Harvey Silverglate said the proposal “amounts to blatant censorship” and is “unconstitutional.”

    “It seems to be the latest in a long effort to broaden the definition of obscenity,” Silverglate said. “We’ve already got (laws) against coercion. Why is that not adequate?”

    http://news.bostonherald.com/news/re...ome&position=3

    Crazy stuff, where do these lawmakers get such rediculous ideas from, treating a legal form of pornography the same as child porn just doesnt make any sense whatsoever, i really hope this goes no further than it has done already.

    Regards,

    Lee


  2. #2
    pr0n monster DrChango's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Posts
    310
    They've done their homework this time, though. They've found some well-meaning dupes in both the private and public sector, and have a cause that is difficult to argue. Like that Silverglate cat pointed out, we already have laws against coercion on the books that would cover those types of cases quite satisfactorily.
    Jacob Stiver
    E-Mail: drchango2010@gmail.com
    ICQ#: 388847435


  3. #3
    I am straight, but my ass is gay jIgG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    2,081
    don't we already have laws against having sex with someone who has not consented or can't consent?

    Wouldn't these people be called rapists if they used a mentally impaired person for sex?

    Naturally it would be a democrat introducing that, just as bad as the other side.

    What is the chance that the district attorney and the politician are running for re-election?


  4. #4
    How long have you been gay?
    Join Date
    Sep 2005
    Posts
    54
    Quote Originally Posted by jIgG View Post
    don't we already have laws against having sex with someone who has not consented or can't consent?

    Wouldn't these people be called rapists if they used a mentally impaired person for sex?

    Naturally it would be a democrat introducing that, just as bad as the other side.

    What is the chance that the district attorney and the politician are running for re-election?
    This is true.

    But they are talking about a more cowardly act than "just rape" though, in that these people are completely helpless...

    But is there an underground pic trading market like with the kidstuff?

    Anyhow the main thing i see in that article is that they're already starting to confound the legitimate, industry side of "porn business" with violence and crime in the mind of the public and reader.

    Fuckers, really. There's no such thing as "child porn" - it's rape, subjugation and exploitation... the word porn should have never gotten involved.

    Complete Video Chat Solution


    ICQ: 248843947
    Phone: 1-866-892-5122 (Ext. 2)


  5. #5
    I'm not gay; I'm British!
    Join Date
    Dec 2006
    Posts
    40

    Heres A Thought Bad lawmakers, no cookie!

    Helloooo! WTF are these witch hunters thinking, now? Yes, in each of those cases, it was clearly abuse, but that doesn't mean it is all abuse! Just like there are straight, bi, gay, and trans individuals who don't mind being on screen for adult entertainment, there can be elderly and disabled individuals who actually may enjoy being on-cam. It will require a lot of courage, but I hope that those who are fighting to oppose this bfs law can bring forth individuals who are willing to be on-screen, because it is something they enjoy. They need to make clear and decisive decisions, on a case-by-case basis. Just because some people are doing screwed up stuff, doesn't mean everyone in "that group" are doing messed up shit!
    :bush: :yeah:


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •