I'd like everybody's opinion, please.....

[chickwoutadick]

if a slang word for cum is jizz,

what would be the word for the guy shooting the jizz?

and what would be the word for the guy receiving/watching the jizz get ejaculated?

[Mansized]

if a slang word for cum is jizz,

what would be the word for the guy shooting the jizz?

and what would be the word for the guy receiving/watching the jizz get ejaculated?

jizzer/jizzed

[tofu]

jizzer/jizzed

I co-sign that. Seems to be the most appropriate...plus, I can't think of anything clever. :mpr:

[nickbaer]

Shooter, pitcher.


The receiver is the receiver. If watching, depending on if he's strictly in the audience, or giving some kind of helping hand, he's the partner, receiver or the voyeur.

If the receiving was bareback in his rectum, then the term "at risk" would be appropriate.

[PFLJayden]

We usually call it (when referencing "jizz") is "blasting jizz." Or if we're considering someone who "jizz's" on another guy is "jizzed, jizzing, jizzes, jizzer" so I agree with mr. mansized.

Before I would use it, I would wait for other GWW'ers to respond.

[PFLJayden]

If the receiving was bareback in his rectum, then the term "at risk" would be appropriate.

We generally call that breeding rather than "at risk" in the film industry. Creampied usually works, but it sounds like a female is getting it.

[Mr. Romance]

Jizz Cannon


Mr. Romance

[Poppy]

I would concur with Jizzer and Jizzed.

[chickwoutadick]

thanks everybody! i appreciate your input!

[nickbaer]

Here's an interesting article about "breeding":

http://www.startribune.com/local/min...131457548.html

[chickwoutadick]

do you guys think that jizz is too nasty of a word to use on a site for gay guys? i always thought it was not a real nasty word (sort of comical), but i don't want to offend anybody. i was telling a straight guy friend of mine about my site and i used that word and he was a bit offended and thought it would cheapen my site. i guess he thought it was pretty nasty. i do have to say that he does not look at porn, gay or straight.

thoughts please......

[Teaser]

We generally call that breeding rather than "at risk" in the film industry. Creampied usually works, but it sounds like a female is getting it.

I like using the term moonpie creampie I associate with females, I use the term moonpie, I think I coined the phrase:wipeglasses:

[Teaser]

do you guys think that jizz is too nasty of a word to use on a site for gay guys? i always thought it was not a real nasty word (sort of comical), but i don't want to offend anybody. i was telling a straight guy friend of mine about my site and i used that word and he was a bit offended and thought it would cheapen my site. i guess he thought it was pretty nasty. i do have to say that he does not look at porn, gay or straight.

thoughts please......

If you don't like the word Jizz if it seems offensive to you there are tons of other terms
cum
spunk
juice
man batter
etc
choose one that appeals to you and your surfers:good:

[PFLJayden]

I like using the term moonpie creampie I associate with females, I use the term moonpie, I think I coined the phrase:wipeglasses:

MMMM Moonpie! I love moonpies! :donmike: You know, the cookie things.



I also like the term "moonpie" as in breeding too. LOL. Next time I have my legs up I'll tell the guy to "moonpie" me. LOL.

That's cute.

[PFLJayden]

Here's an interesting article about "breeding":

http://www.startribune.com/local/min...131457548.html

I don't want this to get heated up... But I want to point out some facts....

Jesus Christ, give me a break. You want to allow "society", which means BIG GOVERNMENT, the right to test for HIV and other "various conditions" at their whim??? We live in the USA because we are FREE. Have you ever heard of the Constitution?

You obviously don't remember when the AIDS crisis first started. If someone looked like they had AIDS, or the "GAY CANCER," it was legal for their landlord to kick them out on the street. It was legal for restaurants and doctors to refuse to treat them. It was alright for employers to fire them. JUST BECAUSE they thought a person had it.

For that reason groups like ACT-UP and others, fought like hell to provide for confidential testing and create laws to ban discrimination. To this day, testing is still done confidentially in most states and NAMES are not reported to the health department, only numbers.

It's terrible reading this story, but honestly, whether someone is 20 or 80 he is responsible for his own health. If the "victim's" agreed to have sex with someone without using a condom.....unless he was raped, someone needs to tell him he needs to accept responsibility for his OWN actions and quit blaming others. Thank God we have the meds today to control the HIV virus. And, frankly, it's a hell of a lot easier to stick to a regimen for HIV than it is for diabetes. I'm not positive, I have friends and a family member who is...

Sorry to get so upset, but dammit, when are people going to start taking responsible for their own actions and quit trying to blame others? That's what's wrong with this country. If you don't believe that, just look at the jerks in Congress.

I understand why some of you are bareback prejudice. Get over it. In this industry you cannot be. In today's age, you cannot be. You can be bareback racist in your free time but when you mix the industry with this, it's pretty damn messed up.

Sorry, after reading that article I felt I needed to say this.