Results 1 to 7 of 7

Thread: Most restrictions on gay men giving blood lifted in the U.K.

  1. #1
    Big Hands/Big Feet=Expensive shoes & gloves!
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    617

    Most restrictions on gay men giving blood lifted in the U.K.

    Restrictions on gay men blood donations lifted
    Gay men will be able to give blood from today as government restrictions are officially lifted, the Department of Health said.

    A lifetime ban on blood donation by men who had had sex with another man was put in place in the UK in the 1980s as a response to the spread of Aids and HIV. But following a review by the Advisory Committee on the Safety of Blood, Tissues and Organs (Sabto), men who have not had homosexual sex within a year will be able to donate if they meet certain other criteria.

    Men who have had anal or oral sex with another man in the past 12 months, with or without a condom, will still not be eligible to donate blood, the DoH said. They said this was to reduce the risk of infections being missed by testing and then being passed on to a patient.

    Sabto's advisory panel, comprising leading experts and patient groups, carried out its review based on the latest available evidence and found it could no longer support the permanent exclusion of men who have had sex with men. They considered the risk of infection being transmitted in blood, attitudes of potential donors in complying with the selection criteria and improvements in testing of donated blood.

    Dr Lorna Williamson, NHS Blood and Transplant's medical and research director, said: "Our priority as a blood service is to provide a safe and sufficient supply of blood for patients."This change gives us an opportunity to broaden our donor acceptance on the basis of the latest scientific evidence. "The Sabto review concluded that the safety of the blood supply would not be affected by the change and we would like to reassure patients receiving transfusions that the blood supply is as safe as it reasonably can be and amongst the safest in the world."

    There has been no documented transmission of a blood-borne virus in the UK since 2005, with no HIV transmission since 2002. "The change has been welcomed by the sexual health charity Terrence Higgins Trust. Chief executive Sir Nick Partridge said: "We welcome this change, which is based on strong new evidence that all the experts are agreed on."

    These regulations will ensure the safety of blood supply for all of us while also being fair and equal in their application."When the announcement was first made human rights campaigner Peter Tatchell argued the new rules fell short of lifting the ban on gay men who always use condoms. He said: "Although the new policy is a big improvement on the existing discriminatory rules, a 12-month ban is still excessive and unjustified."

    Mr Tatchell, who launched the first campaign against the lifetime ban on gay and bisexual blood donors in 1991, added: "Most gay and bisexual men do not have HIV and will never have HIV. If they always have safe sex with a condom, have only one partner and test HIV negative, their blood is safe to donate." They can and should be allowed to help save lives by becoming donors."

    The move will be implemented in England, Scotland and Wales.PA


  2. #2
    Moderator Bec's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Location
    Ohio
    Posts
    8,419
    12 months with no gay sex before being allowed to donate?? I have to agree that seems excessive, but I guess one tiny step forward is better than none.


  3. #3
    They have computers, and they may have other weapons of mass destruction x0pa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,014
    bagh, in canada 50% of canadians will need blood at one time in their life just not from fags ********* dun even get me started
    Dade Williams
    ICQ: 482644794


  4. #4
    virgin by request ;) HunkyLuke's Avatar
    Join Date
    Mar 2008
    Posts
    3,194
    Quote Originally Posted by Bec View Post
    12 months with no gay sex before being allowed to donate?? I have to agree that seems excessive, but I guess one tiny step forward is better than none.
    yup, one small step indeed.
    Luke H.
    Marketing Director
    Zbuckz.com, Jbuckz.com, Dickbank.com, Glamourbuckz.com


  5. #5
    They have computers, and they may have other weapons of mass destruction x0pa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,014
    is there blood bank private or government? cause in canada its private and there not doing shit
    Dade Williams
    ICQ: 482644794


  6. #6
    They have computers, and they may have other weapons of mass destruction x0pa's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2008
    Posts
    1,014
    not to mention but no one is fighting for one of the last few rights here
    Dade Williams
    ICQ: 482644794


  7. #7
    I've always been openly gay. It would never occur to me to behave otherwise. maxx68's Avatar
    Join Date
    Dec 2008
    Location
    Central Florida, USA
    Posts
    506
    I always found the whole ban thing extremely hypocritical.

    Many , many moons ago I used to donate plasma until a new manager took over the place - I was banned while there were people (heteros) donating that I knew fucked anything and everything as well as using all kinds of drugs.

    I've been abstinent for almost 11 years - I should be able to donate blood, plasma, etc...

    They won't lift the banned until the blood shortage hits critical mass. Just like doing away with DADT cause they're gonna need bodies for what's coming.


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •