http://www.boyslightsout.com
A seriously fucked up site IMHO.
I cant understand why any processor would be willing to process for such a site.
Regards,
Lee
http://www.boyslightsout.com
A seriously fucked up site IMHO.
I cant understand why any processor would be willing to process for such a site.
Regards,
Lee
Verotel has always taken too many risks. I wouldn't feel comfortable using them as a CC processor for just this reason,
Btw, I didn't even click the link to see the site... I don't want crap like that anywhere on my harddrive.
Wow! I'm stunned this one got through.
I dont know but this site didn't shock me, as opposed to seeing some of the other rape sites out there this one is tame.
Not sure how i feel about it, I think not seeing blood and knowing the models are, hopefully, doing it by agreenment
Then who and where is the line drawn at bareback (bug chasers, hiv glorifying), S&M, some if heavy and brutal by a lot of people's standarts. Watersports. Some of the rougher hardcore out there with gaging....
I
That site is sick and stupid, shame on Verotel, what the hell are they thinking? Site's that depict violent assault and/or rape should violate their TOS, or are they just money hungry assholes? Domains by proxy sucks too, they should have some kind of standards as well.
I'm disgusted.
i, also, didn't click the link, but i see a lot of sites processed by verotel that other processers wouldn't touch. btw, how do you know the content on a rape site isn't real? the answer is unless they show the model afterwards talking and laughing about it, you don't. so if you promote a rape site, you could unknowingly promote real rape. i wouldn't touch it!
I guess the site was only offline for a minute, I tried again and got into it and the first thing I noticed was a big disclaimer:no doubt that is how they are able to keep their billingThe following samples depict consentual roleplaying.
The models are professional actors.
Please do not try this at home.
cheers,
Luke
without seeing the content i don't think anyone knows.
but then how do we know girls or guys in porn weren't tricked into it with empty promices and lies.
doesn't seem like an extreme site to me, on the outside at least, seen much much worse.
There are people who fantasize about this thing, just as there are people who like S&M.
Im much more concerned with the below 18 looking models that process with Verotel and other processors than this
Hmmm...Maybe The Processor Didn't Know What Kind Of A Site They Were...Not!
I Actually Was Not "Affronted" All The "Violent-Graphics" These Particular "Theme" Sites Have , The Site Had All The Legal Disclaimers And Presented As A Visual Fantasy Notices.
I Give The Webmaster "Merit" For "Presentation" , It Will Be A "hard-Sell" Though , I Don't See Too Many "Sponsers/Affiliates/Etc" Jumping On The Bandwagon Too Quickly , Nor Do I See To Many Members Signing Up Imediately For Fear Of Prosecution!
I Do Not Condone "Rape" So Keep Your Hate/Heat To Yourself! :bomb:
Sincerely ~ ...Welcome To The Adult "Entertainment" Industry!... :francais:
A number of Rape sites use CCBill as well like
GAYHITCHHIKER.COM
Just do a search under CCBill Rape and see all the sites http://www.google.com/search?sourcei...&q=ccbill+rape
Paycom and Jettis process for some rape sites as well. Example:
http://b-d-s-m.org/bdsm-rape.html
http://b-d-s-m.org/rape-bdsm.html
http://b-d-s-m.org/bondage-rape.html
http://b-d-s-m.org/rape-and-bondage.html
http://b-d-s-m.org/femdom-rape.html
Am I missing something here?
Everyone here says freedom of speech is our right. We all rally behind Extreme Associates ( rape porn ) for their free speech rights.
Visa processes for Extreme Associates, why can't Visa process for a Gay porn rape site?
Did anyone take the time to read the extensive disclaimer on the front page of the site?
"8. All models/ actresses and actors whose images appear on this site are over the age of 18, have consented being photographed and/or filmed, have signed model release and provided proof of age."
I'm not into S&M , rape porn, or a number of other legal sex niches but as long as they aren't breaking the law then they have a right to exist and make money.
Originally Posted by jIgG
I agree.
This site is tame too. I've seen S&M sites with all the processors that are much more graphic and disgusting then this.
I just wonder why Lee & Xstr8guy are singling Verotel out when they know all processors process this stuff, whether the processor knows it or not. All they had to do was Google the term and the processor name to see everyone breaking the rules.
out of curiousity I just subscribed to the site. Lame. At the opening of every video the "actors" say "we are paid professional actors. Don't do this at home"
lame
It's a boring site...
What's the whole fuss about it? Do you all suddenly have standards? I mean, some people might get offended by a guy showing his cock, some might get offended by JACKASS and even if these people were not professional actors, who the fuck says that they don't enjoy what they do (ofcourseif they were not forced into it - but many people get forced into mainstream porn)
Just stop moralizing....
This site is nothing to get so fussy about.... There's lots more of pre-teen (like 7 or 8 years old) sites that's I'd be more worried about...
IF YOU REALLY WANT TO SEE SICK STUFF:
http://mds.dark-coll.com/portal/11/dcr/
Yeah and it's $33 a month for 6 vidoes on the site. Needless to say I wont be paying that for the 6 movies they provide in their members section, which aren't even downloadable! Total rip off.Originally Posted by dalimili
I think the people moralizing are funny because legal is legal. All these comments and I'm the only one who chose to comment on experience of subscribing to the actual site. Interesting.
Bookmarks