Results 1 to 15 of 15

Thread: Bizarre Mag Video: who's codec is it ?

  1. #1
    curiousbunny
    Guest

    Bizarre Mag Video: who's codec is it ?

    I was very AMAZED with the quality of the Bizarre Mag's commercial.
    It is 30 seconds in length and 3 megs in size @ 640x370.
    Anyone have an idea what program/codec was used?

    http://movies.maxim-magazine.co.uk/b...drette_640.mov


  2. #2
    Hot guys & hard cocks Squirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,193
    I'd know that pussy anywhere!!! ha ha ha

    I think the file size is mainly due to the dark shoot and lack of color, not as much the codec.. although codecs obviously have something to do with the quality/size of any digitized video :high:
    Naked Straight Men on Squirtit & StraightBro

    ~ In Production ~

    Blindfoldmen.com
    scifimen.com


  3. #3
    curiousbunny
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Squirt
    I think the file size is mainly due to the dark shoot and lack of color, not as much the codec..
    no that's not it, next


  4. #4
    Hot guys & hard cocks Squirt's Avatar
    Join Date
    Sep 2004
    Location
    USA
    Posts
    5,193
    Quote Originally Posted by curiousbunny
    no that's not it, next
    Are you sure? If you add contrast and brighten this video in Cleaner.. the file size increases... but making it darker.. lowers the size.. hmmmm


    .... I think this thread is just a ruse to get people to view Bucks kick ass commerical :high: I love it! Never seen anything like it. It rocks!
    Naked Straight Men on Squirtit & StraightBro

    ~ In Production ~

    Blindfoldmen.com
    scifimen.com


  5. #5
    curiousbunny
    Guest
    yes its a good commercial but no that's not the point.
    I do understand what u say its like a grayscale image and a color image the size is not the same. Less color the smaller the image size. Anyway, I think there's MORE than that 2 this video. Lets hope 2 get some more feedback :mexican:


  6. #6
    chick with a bass basschick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    7,922
    why not ask buck to ask them - and then please tell me, too!!!


  7. #7
    curiousbunny
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by basschick
    why not ask buck to ask them - and then please tell me, too!!!
    I did a few days ago. He said he'd ask the people who worked on it. :extat:


  8. #8
    Polish my nuts and serve me a milkshake Buck Angel's Avatar
    Join Date
    Apr 2004
    Location
    Merida, Mexico
    Posts
    238
    I emailed them they said they would ask the video department haven't got back to me yet..But I have to say that I do think Squirt is right because when they first emailed me about it they said something about it being to dark and wanted to fix it but they never did so...maybe they didn't because it made the file size to large. It does make sense!
    I am so happy you guys like it! Maybe it will start making me some $$$

    Buck


  9. #9
    I am straight, but my ass is gay jIgG's Avatar
    Join Date
    Oct 2003
    Posts
    2,081
    the video is awesome

    the codec is probably H.263 by Apple (MPEG-4) or so I guesstimate

    if a DVD can be shrunk down to 700MB with great quality so can this short clip

    2 pass encoding does that although you have to tinker with other settings as well


  10. #10
    xenigo
    Guest
    This is a fine example of some encoding that took one HELL of a lot of work to get down to that file size, and still look good. Encoding, as you probably know, is a highly technical skill. I'm curious as well to know what exactly they did to get it to look this good, in only 3 megs.

    Obviously the source video was superb, I'm thinking 24p video or something higher rez. Maybe 35mm.


  11. #11
    curiousbunny
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by jIgG
    the codec is probably H.263 by Apple (MPEG-4) or so I guesstimate
    I tried that they have some samples online @
    http://www.leadcodecs.com/Codecs/LEAD-H263.htm

    and they are unplayable in my pc so its proly not the same codec since I can view the bizarre video with no problems.


  12. #12
    curiousbunny
    Guest
    Quote Originally Posted by Buck Angel
    I emailed them
    Thanks Buck ! Keep us posted!


  13. #13
    curiousbunny
    Guest
    [QUOTE=xenigo]Encoding, as you probably know, is a highly technical skill. [QUOTE]

    It can b a breeze with the right codec or a pain w/out it :extat:


  14. #14
    curiousbunny
    Guest

    Mystery Solved !

    Mystery Solved ! The very famous Sorenson Squeeze Pro Codec !


    <p align="center">
    <img border="0" src="http://www.whitejocks.com/buck.gif" width="297" height="502"></p>


  15. #15
    chick with a bass basschick's Avatar
    Join Date
    Nov 2003
    Posts
    7,922
    good job, curiousbunny. thanks!


Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •